[Bug c++/26395] Wrong attempts to create a copy of an anonymous object

2006-02-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-21 15:59 ---
 Please read:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html


GCC before 3.4 was accepting invalid code.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26395



Re: [Bug c++/26395] Wrong attempts to create a copy of an anonymous object

2006-02-21 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

| --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-21 15:59 
---
|  Please read:
| http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
| 
| 
| GCC before 3.4 was accepting invalid code.
| 
| 
| -- 
| 
| pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
| 
|What|Removed |Added
| 
|  Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
|  Resolution||INVALID

In fact, there should be an open PR for this -- which is a request
for enhancement.  The code is ill-formed under C++98 and C++03; it is
well formed in C++0x (the changes are in the Working Paper.)

-- Gaby


[Bug c++/26395] Wrong attempts to create a copy of an anonymous object

2006-02-21 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net


--- Comment #2 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  2006-02-21 17:19 
---
Subject: Re:  Wrong attempts to create a copy of an anonymous object

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

| --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-21 15:59
---
|  Please read:
| http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
| 
| 
| GCC before 3.4 was accepting invalid code.
| 
| 
| -- 
| 
| pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
| 
|What|Removed |Added
| 
|  Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
|  Resolution||INVALID

In fact, there should be an open PR for this -- which is a request
for enhancement.  The code is ill-formed under C++98 and C++03; it is
well formed in C++0x (the changes are in the Working Paper.)

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26395