[Bug c++/29106] [4.0/4.1 Regression] sizeof(*var) in expression drops entire line of code out of compile

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-14 05:11 
---
Subject: Bug 29106

Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Nov 14 05:11:32 2006
New Revision: 118803

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118803
Log:
PR c++/29106
* init.c (constant_value_1): Treat a DECL_INITIAL of
error_mark_node as meaning that the variable is uninitialized,
rather than erroneously initialized.
PR c++/29106
* g++.dg/init/self1.C: New test.
* g++.dg/other/fold1.C: Adjust error markers.
* g++.dg/init/member1.C: Likewise.

Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/self1.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/init.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/member1.C
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/fold1.C


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29106

[Bug c++/29106] [4.0/4.1 Regression] sizeof(*var) in expression drops entire line of code out of compile

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-01 18:28 
---
Egads, that's awful.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29106

[Bug c++/29106] [4.0/4.1 Regression] sizeof(*var) in expression drops entire line of code out of compile

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-27 09:46 ---
Janis, can you hunt this?  The 4.1 branch doesn't print anything while 4.2
prints
size of thingy is 4.

Thanks!


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||janis at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29106

[Bug c++/29106] [4.0/4.1 Regression] sizeof(*var) in expression drops entire line of code out of compile

[janis at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-27 23:16 ---
A regression hunt on the gcc-4_1-branch identified the following patch where
the failure starts:

http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=111231

r111231 | mmitchel | 2006-02-18 08:37:34 + (Sat, 18 Feb 2006)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29106

[Bug c++/29106] [4.0/4.1 Regression] sizeof(*var) in expression drops entire line of code out of compile

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-17 19:27 ---
Confirmed, still broken as of today 4.1.2 20060917.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-09-17 19:27:47
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29106

[Bug c++/29106] [4.0/4.1 Regression] sizeof(*var) in expression drops entire line of code out of compile

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-16 23:45 ---
It also worked in 4.1.0 20051026.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail||4.1.2
Summary|sizeof(*var) in expression  |[4.0/4.1 Regression]
   |drops entire line of code   |sizeof(*var) in expression
   |out of compile  |drops entire line of code
   ||out of compile
   Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29106