[Bug c++/30539] Accepts invalid explicit specialization declaration

2012-01-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539

Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-01-03 
16:07:18 UTC ---
Fixed in 4.5.x.

[Bug c++/30539] Accepts invalid explicit specialization declaration

2012-01-03 Thread bangerth at gmail dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539

--- Comment #3 from Wolfgang Bangerth bangerth at gmail dot com 2012-01-03 
19:11:09 UTC ---
Excellent, and thanks! It's good to see that some of the 5+ year old reports
are still being closed on occasion :-)

(Although I have to say that this one was one of the more humorous, allowing
to write 
  template  void X1::X2::X3::X4::f();
I'm almost going to miss that ;-)

[Bug c++/30539] Accepts invalid explicit specialization declaration

2007-01-22 Thread sebor at roguewave dot com 


--- Comment #1 from sebor at roguewave dot com  2007-01-22 16:25 ---
Even better, this works too:

  template  void X1::X2::X3::X4::f();


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539