[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2008-02-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-04 03:29 ---
Subject: Bug 33916

Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb  4 03:28:53 2008
New Revision: 132088

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132088
Log:
PR c++/33916
* cp/init.c (build_value_init_1): New function.
(build_value_init): New function.
* cp/typeck2.c (build_functional_cast): Call it.
* cp/cp-gimplify.c (cp_gimplify_init_expr): Handle its output.

* cp/cp-tree.h (TYPE_HAS_USER_CONSTRUCTOR): Rename from
TYPE_HAS_CONSTRUCTOR.
* cp/class.c (finish_struct_bits,
maybe_warn_about_overly_private_class,
add_implicitly_declared_members): Adjust.
(check_field_decls): Adjust. Remove warnings about reference/const
in class without constructor.
(check_bases_and_members): Adjust.  Give those warnings here instead.
* cp/decl.c (fixup_anonymous_aggr): Adjust.
(check_initializer): Adjust, clarify logic slightly.
(grok_special_member_properties): Adjust, only set if user-provided.
* cp/rtti.c (create_tinfo_types): Don't set.
* cp/cvt.c (ocp_convert): Remove exception for vtable_entry_type et al.
Use same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p.
* cp/pt.c (check_explicit_specialization): Adjust.
(instantiate_class_template): Adjust.

* print-tree.c (print_node) [CONSTRUCTOR]: Print elements.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/value1.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wextra-1.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wextra-2.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/class.c
trunk/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
trunk/gcc/cp/cvt.c
trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c
trunk/gcc/cp/init.c
trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c
trunk/gcc/cp/rtti.c
trunk/gcc/cp/typeck2.c
trunk/gcc/print-tree.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/ctor8.C


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916

[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2008-02-01 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-01 16:55 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.2.3   |4.2.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916

[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2008-01-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-25 15:46 ---
Jason, can you coordinate with Mark and help with the remaining P1 C++
regressions?


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916

[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2008-01-22 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-22 21:01 ---
There is some discussion about this bug in the following thread on gcc-patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00326.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916

[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2008-01-07 Thread crowl at google dot com 


--- Comment #5 from crowl at google dot com  2008-01-07 18:58 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize
array members

Value initialization was in C++98 TC1 (2003) as a result of core issue 178.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916

[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2008-01-07 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-07 18:13 
---
I still agree that we should fix this -- but it is worth noting that
value-initialization did not exist in C++98.  I believe that the current G++
behavior conforms to the original C++98 specification.

Does anyone know if this change was in C++98 TC1?  Or not until C++0x?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916

[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2008-01-02 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2007-12-10 18:15:07 |2008-01-02 23:32:42
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916

[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2007-12-12 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916

[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2007-12-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
   Target Milestone|--- |4.2.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916

[Bug c++/33916] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Default constructor fails to initialize array members

2007-12-10 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-11 00:03 ---
A regression hunt on powerpc-linux identified this patch:

http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=117834

r117834 | mmitchel | 2006-10-17 22:35:29 + (Tue, 17 Oct 2006)


-- 

janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916