[Bug c++/34691] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Default argument checking not performed after overload resolution with C linkage

2009-03-26 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-26 16:10 ---
I agree that it seems like the first testcase should be ill-formed, but I can't
find anything in the standard that says it is, and the EDG front end also
accepts it.  Do you have a citation?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34691

[Bug c++/34691] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Default argument checking not performed after overload resolution with C linkage

2009-03-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2008-01-06 20:54:23 |2009-03-25 21:10:24
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34691

[Bug c++/34691] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Default argument checking not performed after overload resolution with C linkage

2009-02-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-11 21:31 ---
I've reopened PR 28274 with the PR in comment #2.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34691

[Bug c++/34691] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Default argument checking not performed after overload resolution with C linkage

2009-01-16 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-16 20:03 ---
3.2.3 also fails the first testcase.  This seems to have been broken by

2001-03-01  Nathan Sidwell  nat...@codesourcery.com

* decl2.c (do_nonmember_using_decl): Don't complain if we find
same function. Do complain about ambiguating extern C
declarations.

which stopped using duplicate_decls

The testcase in comment #2 (rejects-valid) passes with 3.2, but fails with 3.4.

The testcase in comment #3 (accepts-invalid) has never worked.

The first and last tests have to do with us not having a framework for checking
compatibility of extern C declarations; the function that complains about
incompatible declarations is duplicate_decls, and that assumes that both decls
are in the same scope and therefore we can clobber one of them.

But Dodji just added a place to check compatibility of extern C declarations
in his fix for 13699.  Dodji, want to extend that to handle #1 and #3?  #2
should be a separate PR I think.


-- 

jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
  Known to fail|3.3.6   |3.2.3 3.3.6


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34691

[Bug c++/34691] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Default argument checking not performed after overload resolution with C linkage

2008-07-04 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-04 22:54 ---
Closing 4.1 branch.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
   |Default argument checking   |Default argument checking
   |not performed after overload|not performed after overload
   |resolution with C linkage   |resolution with C linkage


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34691