[Bug c++/39679] Some absent attributes in the tree-dump should be added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39679 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- g++ no longer supports the -fdump-translation-unit flag: $ /usr/local/bin/g++ -c -fdump-translation-unit -fsyntax-only -std=gnu++98 53360.cc cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-fdump-translation-unit’ $ I think I remember some debate on gcc-patches about removing it for gcc8 but I forget the link to the thread... closing as WONTFIX since the flag probably won't be coming back
[Bug c++/39679] Some absent attributes in the tree-dump should be added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39679 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|susanin at ispras dot ru|g...@integrable-solutions.ne ||t --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-24 11:56:37 UTC --- Hi Gaby. What do you think about this? I suppose, if we like the idea, we could apply the patch even without a Copyright assignment, because it's so small, and resolve the issue.
[Bug c++/39679] Some absent attributes in the tree-dump should be added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39679 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-28 23:57:07 UTC --- Did you send the patch to the gcc-patches mailing list?
[Bug c++/39679] Some absent attributes in the tree-dump should be added
--- Comment #3 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-08 09:53 --- Subject: Re: Some absent attributes in the tree-dump should be added pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org a écrit : --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 18:28 --- this dump file is only supposed to be used to debug gcc. True. For what it is worth, you might want to post your patch to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org so that it has more exposure and triggers more discussion. For patches, the gcc-patches mailing list tends to get more exposure to the GCC hackers than the bugzilla. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39679
[Bug c++/39679] Some absent attributes in the tree-dump should be added
--- Comment #1 from susanin at ispras dot ru 2009-04-07 14:13 --- Created an attachment (id=17600) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17600action=view) This patch add some absent function attributes to the tree-dump -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39679
[Bug c++/39679] Some absent attributes in the tree-dump should be added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 18:28 --- this dump file is only supposed to be used to debug gcc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39679
