[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 --- Comment #10 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-11 06:03:42 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Wed May 11 06:03:38 2011 New Revision: 173644 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173644 Log: gcc/cp/ChangeLog: 2011-05-11 Fabien Chene fab...@gcc.gnu.org PR c++/48859 * init.c (diagnose_uninitialized_cst_or_ref_member_1): stop the recursion if there is user defined constructor. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2011-05-11 Fabien Chene fab...@gcc.gnu.org PR c++/48859 * g++.dg/init/pr48859.C: New. Added: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/pr48859.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/init.c branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #7 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-10 08:15:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Thanks, Fabien! N.B. the svn commit message should be the ChangeLog entry (look at the svn log for any file to see what's normally done) Oups, sorry. I would be careful next time.
[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-10 15:42:54 UTC --- Thanks! Is this patch ok for the 4.6 branch too? If you don't have time to backport it, I can.
[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 --- Comment #9 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-10 16:27:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Thanks! Is this patch ok for the 4.6 branch too? Yes, as it is a 4.6 regression, and Jason also approved it for 4.6. If you don't have time to backport it, I can. I was planning to backport it this evening, thanks.
[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 --- Comment #5 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-09 17:42:24 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Mon May 9 17:42:21 2011 New Revision: 173583 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173583 Log: Fix PR C++/48859 Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/pr48859.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/init.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-09 18:01:37 UTC --- Thanks, Fabien! N.B. the svn commit message should be the ChangeLog entry (look at the svn log for any file to see what's normally done)
[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04 12:33:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) The workaround, of course, is to define the empty default constructor in ConstMember. Or simply add an empty new-initializer, which works when you can't change the definition of ConstMember
[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2011.05.04 12:32:05 CC||fabien.chene at gmail dot ||com Summary|Regression: incorrect |[4.6/4.7 Regression] |uninitialized const|incorrect uninitialized |member error on new|const member error on new |without new-initializer |without new-initializer Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04 12:32:05 UTC --- Fabien, could you take a look? I think Andrew's right that this was caused by the patch for PR 25811
[Bug c++/48859] [4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |fabien at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04 13:52:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Fabien, could you take a look? I think Andrew's right that this was caused by the patch for PR 25811 Sure.
