[Bug c++/58022] [4.8 Regression] Compiler rejects abstract class in template class with friend operator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58022 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed for 4.8.2
[Bug c++/58022] [4.8 Regression] Compiler rejects abstract class in template class with friend operator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58022 --- Comment #3 from Ryan Johnson scovich at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1) Please try to reduce the testcase further, no includes. You have a number of options here: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction Sorry, I thought ostream was an important part of the bug and did some work to put it back in... Here's the fully reduced case: // --- begin bug.cpp --- templatetypename _CharT class basic_ostream; typedef basic_ostreamchar ostream; templatetypename T basic_ostreamT operator(basic_ostreamT, T); template class T class foo; template class T ostream operator(ostream, const fooT); template class T class foo { friend ostream operator T (ostream, const fooT); }; class bar; foobar fb; class bar { virtual void baz()=0; }; // --- end bug.cpp ---
[Bug c++/58022] [4.8 Regression] Compiler rejects abstract class in template class with friend operator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58022 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-07-29 Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Thanks. Confirmed as a regression present only in 4_8-branch.