[Bug c++/63936] [5.0 regression] ICE: libstdc++-v3/include/chrono:725:66: internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/constexpr.c:1020

2014-11-18 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63936

Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2014-11-18
 CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|ICE:|[5.0 regression] ICE:
   |libstdc++-v3/include/chrono |libstdc++-v3/include/chrono
   |:725:66: internal compiler  |:725:66: internal compiler
   |error: in adjust_temp_type, |error: in adjust_temp_type,
   |at cp/constexpr.c:1020  |at cp/constexpr.c:1020
 Ever confirmed|0   |1


[Bug c++/63936] [5.0 regression] ICE: libstdc++-v3/include/chrono:725:66: internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/constexpr.c:1020

2014-11-18 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63936

--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm... aarch64-none-elf builds succesfully


[Bug c++/63936] [5.0 regression] ICE: libstdc++-v3/include/chrono:725:66: internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/constexpr.c:1020

2014-11-18 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63936

--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34026
  -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34026action=edit
tarball of preprocessed file that ICEs

I'm attaching the preprocessed file that ICEs.
It just needs a -std=gnu++0x when compiling with an arm cross compiler, any
optimisation level (the ICE is in the parser)


[Bug c++/63936] [5.0 regression] ICE: libstdc++-v3/include/chrono:725:66: internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/constexpr.c:1020

2014-11-18 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63936

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Turns out it's a dup

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 63934 ***