[Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > Fixed on master with r11-1571-g57b4daf8dc4ed7b6. Which was also committed on the GCC 10 branch with r10-8343-gc3d4dbc68be14842 . So fixed.
[Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Fixed on master with r11-1571-g57b4daf8dc4ed7b6.
[Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I needed one slight change to get the code to compiler (I needed this change even for clang and MSVC): Change: requires sizeof...(ArgumentsRest) % 2 == 0 to: requires (sizeof...(ArgumentsRest) % 2 == 0) With that change GCC 10.2.0 and GCC 11+ were able to compile the code just fine (GCC 10.1.0 does reject it though).
[Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fail||11.0 Last reconfirmed|2019-10-15 00:00:00 |2020-6-8 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- Reconfirmed on mainline.
[Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2019-10-15 Ever confirmed|0 |1