[Bug c++/68074] [C++14] Complex ConstExpr Evaluation

2024-07-24 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68074

Jason Merrill  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill  ---
I can't reproduce this problem now; even GCC 5 branch output agrees with GCC 15
trunk and clang.  So I'm going to assume it was fixed.

[Bug c++/68074] [C++14] Complex ConstExpr Evaluation

2016-03-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68074

Jason Merrill  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2016-03-03
 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

[Bug c++/68074] [C++14] Complex ConstExpr Evaluation

2015-10-23 Thread arbmind at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68074

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Reischuck  ---
Fixed some issues in my example.
http://goo.gl/Rxq7TP

The ranged for loops now compile on clang. The problem is not the loop, but the
address calculation.