[Bug c++/78124] [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78124

Jason Merrill  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill  ---
Fixed.

[Bug c++/78124] [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78124

--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill  ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 17 21:41:09 2016
New Revision: 242563

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242563&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78124 - list-initialization and inherited ctor

* name-lookup.c (do_class_using_decl): Set CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/inh-ctor23.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
trunk/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c

[Bug c++/78124] [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored

[lucdanton at free dot fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78124

--- Comment #2 from lucdanton at free dot fr ---
I ran into a different program that regressed starting at r241187 (again, only
for -std=c++1z), this time not involving explicit constructors:

//--
struct aggr {
int x;
};

struct base {
base(aggr) {}
};

struct derived: base {
using base::base;
};

base fine() { return { { 0 } }; }
// error: could not convert '{{0}}' from '' to
'derived'
derived uhoh() { return { { 0 } }; }

int main()
{
}

[Bug c++/78124] [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78124

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/78124] [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored

[marxin at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78124

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||rejects-valid
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2016-10-27
 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška  ---
Confirmed. According to my bisecting script first affected is r241187.