[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iamkirkezz at gmail dot com --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 116446 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haining.cpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 79624 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||delacroix777 at proton dot me --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 116368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephan.oostveen@nextlevel- ||electronics.com --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 98919 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@nicholas-schwab.de --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 92509 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 86185 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at abeckmann dot de --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 59960 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2018-04-16 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Confirmed. Clang rejects the original with: auto.cc:5:3: error: 'auto' deduced as 'long' in declaration of 'i' and deduced as 'int' in declaration of 'j' auto i = t, j = 1; ^~ ~ auto.cc:25:3: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'foo' requested here foo (0L); ^ auto.cc:12:3: error: 'auto' deduced as 'int' in declaration of 'i' and deduced as 'long' in declaration of 'j' auto i = 1, j = t, k = 2; ^~ ~ auto.cc:26:3: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'bar' requested here bar (0L); ^ auto.cc:19:3: error: 'auto' deduced as 'int' in declaration of 'i' and deduced as 'long' in declaration of 'j' auto i = t, j = u; ^~ ~ auto.cc:27:3: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'foo' requested here foo (1, 2L); ^ 3 errors generated. And similarly for comment 2: auto.cc:7:9: error: 'auto' deduced as 'S' in declaration of 's' and deduced as 'int' in declaration of 'i' auto s = S(), i = 1; ^~~ ~ auto.cc:11:9: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'f' requested here f(); ^ 1 error generated.
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009
Sasha Unknown changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sasha2048 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Sasha Unknown ---
I confirm that this still happens on my g++-7 (Ubuntu 7.2.0-1ubuntu1~16.04)
7.2.0.
My test program (essentially the same as original):
template
struct S {};
template
void f() {
auto s = S(), i = 1;
}
int main() {
f();
return 0;
}
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Martin Dorey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martindorey at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from Martin Dorey --- In my testing today, gcc 4.7.2, gcc 6.2.1 and Debian experimental's gcc 7.0.0 20161230, among other versions, reject the one-argument foo and bar instantiations from the OP's testcase, as I think they should. They accept the two-argument foo, I think incorrectly, an accepts-invalid bug. (clang rejects all three.) But the Subject line's use of "nondependent" suggests the OP is reporting an accepts-invalid error on the one-argument instantiations. Could it be that's a regression between 20161230 and 2017-01-05? I don't feel the two-argument foo - the bug I can reproduce - is covered by the Subject line. That's OK, as: Bug #59960 - accepts ill-formed 'auto a1 = t1, a2 = t2;' where t1 and t2 have different template types ... looks to have reported much the same thing, some three years earlier. It's unloved by any cc:s and, unlike this PR, has no Depends-on.
[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Bug 79009 depends on bug 78693, which changed state. Bug 78693 Summary: [6 Regression] Bogus 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78693 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
