[Bug c++/92070] [10 regression] -fchecking=2 error: taking address of rvalue

[dimhen at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92070

--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko  ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
> Fixed.

r267903 FAIL and r267907 PASS for me with original problem -- LLVM-current
build

Thanks

[Bug c++/92070] [10 regression] -fchecking=2 error: taking address of rvalue

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92070

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek  ---
Fixed.

[Bug c++/92070] [10 regression] -fchecking=2 error: taking address of rvalue

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92070

--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek  ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Oct 11 20:53:26 2019
New Revision: 276907

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276907&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/92070 - bogus error with -fchecking=2.

* g++.dg/expr/cond17.C: New test.


Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/cond17.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug c++/92070] [10 regression] -fchecking=2 error: taking address of rvalue

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92070

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek  ---
Yes, essentially, but I don't want to lose the new test.

[Bug c++/92070] [10 regression] -fchecking=2 error: taking address of rvalue

[dimhen at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92070

--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko  ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Will be fixed by my patch
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00782.html
> but the testcase is useful.

dup PR92049?

[Bug c++/92070] [10 regression] -fchecking=2 error: taking address of rvalue

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92070

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2019-10-11
 CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |mpolacek at gcc dot 
gnu.org
   Target Milestone|--- |10.0
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek  ---
Will be fixed by my patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00782.html
but the testcase is useful.