[Bug c++/93458] ICE using coroutines
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- bah, I messed up the commit message, should be fixed by: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2020-02/msg00063.html
[Bug c++/93458] ICE using coroutines
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458 --- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey --- > BTW, did you include ? > > (FAOD: it would still be broken if you did, but ISTM we might at some point > add a hint that if the traits can't be found, you probably forgot that). The code was exactly as written, though IIRC including still yielded the ICE.
[Bug c++/93458] ICE using coroutines
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #1) > I think it's invalid. Yes, it's invalid, unfortunately, one cannot write a C++20 coroutine in such a simple form; they need supporting methods that are found through the class type they instantiate. BTW, did you include ? (FAOD: it would still be broken if you did, but ISTM we might at some point add a hint that if the traits can't be found, you probably forgot that).
[Bug c++/93458] ICE using coroutines
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |10.0 Target Milestone|--- |10.0
[Bug c++/93458] ICE using coroutines
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2020-01-28 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, started with the introduction of the feature in r10-6063-g49789fd08378e3ff.
[Bug c++/93458] ICE using coroutines
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93458 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey --- I think it's invalid.