[Bug c++/95159] ICE on aggregate template parameter with empty angle brackets

2021-04-30 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek  ---
Fixed by r12-100.

[Bug c++/95159] ICE on aggregate template parameter with empty angle brackets

2020-07-09 Thread lutztonineubert at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159

--- Comment #5 from Toni Neubert  ---
I don't think this one is valid.

But the code inside the duplicated issue could be valid:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96123

[Bug c++/95159] ICE on aggregate template parameter with empty angle brackets

2020-07-09 Thread lutztonineubert at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159

--- Comment #4 from Toni Neubert  ---
I don't think this one is valid.

But the code inside the duplicated issue could be valid:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96123

[Bug c++/95159] ICE on aggregate template parameter with empty angle brackets

2020-07-08 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lutztonineubert at gmail dot 
com

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek  ---
*** Bug 96123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/95159] ICE on aggregate template parameter with empty angle brackets

2020-05-17 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2020-05-18
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška  ---
Confirmed. Started with introduction of -std=c++2a.
Is it a valid or invalid code?

[Bug c++/95159] ICE on aggregate template parameter with empty angle brackets

2020-05-15 Thread pacoarjonilla at yahoo dot es
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159

--- Comment #1 from Paco Arjonilla  ---
GCC 10.1, not GCC 10.0.1