[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

2021-03-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8e7f3f3f33e22721a28772cc3f9b616e48cd1c9

commit r11-7469-gf8e7f3f3f33e22721a28772cc3f9b616e48cd1c9
Author: Jason Merrill 
Date:   Thu Feb 11 22:01:19 2021 -0500

cgraph: flatten and same_body aliases [PR96078]

The patch for PR92372 made us start warning about a flatten attribute on an
alias.  But in the case of C++ 'tor base/complete variants, the user didn't
create the alias.  If the alias target also has the attribute, the alias
points to a flattened function, so we shouldn't warn.

gcc/ChangeLog:

PR c++/96078
* cgraphunit.c (process_function_and_variable_attributes): Don't
warn about flatten on an alias if the target also has it.
* cgraph.h (symtab_node::get_alias_target_tree): New.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

PR c++/96078
* g++.dg/ext/attr-flatten1.C: New test.

[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

2021-02-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078

--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill  ---
Created attachment 50174
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50174&action=edit
proposed patch

[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

2021-02-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078

Jason Merrill  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

2020-10-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2

[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

2020-07-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|10.2|10.3

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 10.2 is released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

2020-07-07 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška  ---
Started with r10-7279-gf22712bd8a2ed57d.

[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

2020-07-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |10.2

[Bug c++/96078] [10/11 Regression] flatten attribute on constructor and destructor causes spurious warning

2020-07-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
  Known to work||9.3.0
   Keywords||diagnostic
   Last reconfirmed||2020-07-06
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
  Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.0