[Bug c++/97279] GCC ignores the operation definition of the template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |12.0 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Fixed. g++.dg/lookup/operator-3.C covers this issue.
[Bug c++/97279] GCC ignores the operation definition of the template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Keywords|needs-bisection | See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=51577 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Fixed in r12-702-g6ab1176667734bd6.
[Bug c++/97279] GCC ignores the operation definition of the template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.1.0 Known to work||12.0 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Seems fixed on the trunk.
[Bug c++/97279] GCC ignores the operation definition of the template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-07 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Thanks Harald. Confirmed then, I suppose.
[Bug c++/97279] GCC ignores the operation definition of the template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment #2 from Harald van Dijk --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > Hmm, ICC also produces 2. Not quite sure what's going on here. ICC produces 2 by default, but produces 1 when the -strict-ansi command line option is used.
[Bug c++/97279] GCC ignores the operation definition of the template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Hmm, ICC also produces 2. Not quite sure what's going on here.