[Bug c++/98644] [10/11 Regression] [concepts] ICE in satisfaction_value, at cp/constraint.cc:2825
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|10.5|12.0 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- Fixed for GCC 12+, this doesn't seem worthwhile to backport since it's ICE-on-invalid.
[Bug c++/98644] [10/11 Regression] [concepts] ICE in satisfaction_value, at cp/constraint.cc:2825
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
[Bug c++/98644] [10/11 Regression] [concepts] ICE in satisfaction_value, at cp/constraint.cc:2825
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression] |[concepts] ICE in |[concepts] ICE in |satisfaction_value, at |satisfaction_value, at |cp/constraint.cc:2825 |cp/constraint.cc:2825 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka --- Fixed (finally) for GCC 12 so far.
[Bug c++/98644] [10/11 Regression] [concepts] ICE in satisfaction_value, at cp/constraint.cc:2825
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.3|10.4 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- GCC 10.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.4.
[Bug c++/98644] [10/11 Regression] [concepts] ICE in satisfaction_value, at cp/constraint.cc:2825
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug c++/98644] [10/11 Regression] [concepts] ICE in satisfaction_value, at cp/constraint.cc:2825
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1) > Confirmed. We started ICEing on the first testcase after r10-7361, and on > the second testcase after r11-5799. Previously, we would issue the fatal > error > > error: ‘reinterpret_cast(1)’ is not a constant expression > > during satisfaction (as per [temp.constr]/3). Oops, I meant to say [temp.constr.atomic]/3 here. Investigating.
[Bug c++/98644] [10/11 Regression] [concepts] ICE in satisfaction_value, at cp/constraint.cc:2825
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98644 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.3.0 Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0 Summary|[concepts] ICE in |[10/11 Regression] |satisfaction_value, at |[concepts] ICE in |cp/constraint.cc:2825 |satisfaction_value, at ||cp/constraint.cc:2825 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Last reconfirmed||2021-01-13 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- Confirmed. We started ICEing on the first testcase after r10-7361, and on the second testcase after r11-5799. Previously, we would issue the fatal error error: ‘reinterpret_cast(1)’ is not a constant expression during satisfaction (as per [temp.constr]/3).