[Bug c/17534] gcc fails to diagnose suspect expressions that have incompatible bit masks

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17534

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |6.0
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Fixed for GCC 6 by r6-2453-g05b28fd6f91016 (aka PR 66555) so just marking as a
dup of that bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 66555 ***

[Bug c/17534] gcc fails to diagnose suspect expressions that have incompatible bit masks

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17534

Manuel López-Ibáñez  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com

--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez  ---
*** Bug 46582 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/17534] gcc fails to diagnose suspect expressions that have incompatible bit masks

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17534

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com

--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek  ---
*** Bug 59491 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/17534] gcc fails to diagnose suspect expressions that have incompatible bit masks

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17534

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com

--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek  ---
*** Bug 65423 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/17534] gcc fails to diagnose suspect expressions that have incompatible bit masks

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17534

--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez  2011-10-21 
14:10:52 UTC ---
Still an issue with revision 180166. This could be warned by Wlogical-op.

[Bug c/17534] gcc fails to diagnose suspect expressions that have incompatible bit masks

[trt at acm dot org]

--- Comment #5 from trt at acm dot org  2005-11-15 15:43 ---
Since fold() is increasingly used for internal speculative computations, I
think it should avoid issuing warnings as false positives are too likely.  So
perhaps this warning belongs in parser_build_binary_op() in c-typeck.c

Similarly for bug 16302


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17534