[Bug c/25309] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE on initialization of a huge array
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-18 15:43 --- I see this error for cris-axis-elf with trunk, as late as r123034: gcc.dg/large-size-array-2.c:6: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:4867 I think the proper action is to re-open the PR, right? -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25309
[Bug c/25309] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE on initialization of a huge array
--- Comment #9 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-03 18:49 --- Subject: Bug 25309 Author: sayle Date: Wed May 3 18:49:40 2006 New Revision: 113500 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113500 Log: PR c/25309 * c-typeck.c (struct spelling): Make I an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT. (push_array_bounds): Delete prototype. Change BOUNDS argument to an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT. (print_spelling): Use HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_UNSIGNED to output the array index. (really_start_incremental_init): No need to call convert because bitsize_zero_node is already of type bitsizetype. (push_init_level): Extract the value of constructor_index as an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT quantity, using tree_low_cst. (process_init_element): Likewise. * gcc.dg/large-size-array-2.c: New test case. Added: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/large-size-array-2.c Modified: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/c-typeck.c branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25309
[Bug c/25309] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE on initialization of a huge array
--- Comment #10 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-05-04 00:14 --- This should now be fixed on mainline and all active branches. -- roger at eyesopen dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.0.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25309
[Bug c/25309] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE on initialization of a huge array
--- Comment #8 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 17:15 --- Subject: Bug 25309 Author: sayle Date: Tue May 2 17:15:25 2006 New Revision: 113476 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113476 Log: PR c/25309 * c-typeck.c (struct spelling): Make I an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT. (push_array_bounds): Delete prototype. Change BOUNDS argument to an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT. (print_spelling): Use HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_UNSIGNED to output the array index. (really_start_incremental_init): No need to call convert because bitsize_zero_node is already of type bitsizetype. (push_init_level): Extract the value of constructor_index as an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT quantity, using tree_low_cst. (process_init_element): Likewise. * gcc.dg/large-size-array-2.c: New test case. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/large-size-array-2.c Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/c-typeck.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25309
[Bug c/25309] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE on initialization of a huge array
--- Comment #7 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 20:00 --- Subject: Bug 25309 Author: sayle Date: Fri Apr 28 19:59:57 2006 New Revision: 113355 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113355 Log: PR c/25309 * c-typeck.c (struct spelling): Make I an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT. (push_array_bounds): Delete prototype. Change BOUNDS argument to an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT. (print_spelling): Use HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_UNSIGNED to output the array index. (really_start_incremental_init): No need to call convert because bitsize_zero_node is already of type bitsizetype. (push_init_level): Extract the value of constructor_index as an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT quantity, using tree_low_cst. (process_init_element): Likewise. * gcc.dg/large-size-array-2.c: New test case. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/large-size-array-2.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/c-typeck.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25309