[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-18 01:23 ---
*** Bug 42421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bradley at dunn dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-18 01:24 ---
*** Bug 11494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||orrd-bugzilla at vipe dot
   ||technion dot ac dot il


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-18 01:24 ---
*** Bug 32805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||xiewensheng at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||yaxi1984 at gmail dot com

--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski  2011-01-30 
02:47:56 UTC ---
*** Bug 47539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

Pavel M  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com

--- Comment #15 from Pavel M  ---
Please add to "Duplicates" list:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33547
- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45184

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||j at uriah dot heep.sax.de

--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski  ---
*** Bug 33547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||alt...@arts-union.ru

--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski  ---
*** Bug 45184 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[zackw at panix dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

Zack Weinberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zackw at panix dot com

--- Comment #14 from Zack Weinberg  ---
I think we should reopen this bug and treat it as a request to improve the
diagnostics.

GCC is correct to reject tokens of the form "0x000E-0x0001", but the
accumulation of duplicate bug reports suggests that we could do a better job of
explaining what is wrong.  Proposal: whenever we are about to issue the
"invalid suffix on (integer/floating) constant" error, if the first character
of the "invalid suffix" is + or -, we say instead something like

error: invalid numeric constant ""
note: ('+'/'-') after ('e'/'p'/'E'/'P') continues a pp-number
note: to perform (addition/subtraction), put a space before the ('+'/'-')

Printing the entire pp-number token instead of just the "suffix", mentioning
the standardese term "pp-number", and calling the token an "invalid numeric
constant" instead of an "invalid integer/floating constant" should clue people
in to _why_ this apparently perverse tokenization is happening.

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bratsinot at gmail dot com

--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab  2012-09-15 12:02:04 
UTC ---
*** Bug 54587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski  ---
*** Bug 63324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||draqsn at mail dot ru

--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski  ---
*** Bug 44272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***