[Bug c/39450] gcc.dg/asm-b.c compilation fails to produce executable

2009-03-12 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-03-13 04:06 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39451 ***


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450

[Bug c/39450] gcc.dg/asm-b.c compilation fails to produce executable

2009-03-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 


--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2009-03-13 
03:58 ---
This regression is caused by r144812.


r144812 | vmakarov | 2009-03-12 10:39:55 -0400 (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) | 8 lines

2009-03-12  Vladimir Makarov  

PR debug/39432
* ira-int.h (struct allocno): Fix comment for calls_crossed_num.
* ira-conflicts.c (ira_build_conflicts): Prohibit call used
registers for allocnos created from user-defined variables.


Revision 144811 doesn't show the failure in gcc.dg/asm-b.c.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450

[Bug c/39450] gcc.dg/asm-b.c compilation fails to produce executable

2009-03-12 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 


--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2009-03-13 
01:27 ---
Subject: Re:  gcc.dg/asm-b.c compilation fails to produce executable

> I also see this fail.

Specifically, I see it in r144826.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450

[Bug c/39450] gcc.dg/asm-b.c compilation fails to produce executable

2009-03-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 


--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2009-03-13 
01:27 ---
Fails at both -m32 and -m64.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450

[Bug c/39450] gcc.dg/asm-b.c compilation fails to produce executable

2009-03-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 


--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2009-03-13 
01:24 ---
Dave's last posted results without this is r144796.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450

[Bug c/39450] gcc.dg/asm-b.c compilation fails to produce executable

2009-03-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-13 01:23 ---
I also see this fail.


-- 

danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-03-13 01:23:41
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450

[Bug c/39450] gcc.dg/asm-b.c compilation fails to produce executable

2009-03-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 


--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2009-03-13 
01:17 ---
Correction...the regression is observed on i686-apple-darwin9. I haven't
checked current gcc trunk under darwin10 yet.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39450