[Bug c/44884] RX tst insn has been not fixed yet.
--- Comment #1 from kazuhiro dot inaoka dot ud at renesas dot com 2010-07-09 05:02 --- Created an attachment (id=21154) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21154action=view) check pattern C source This is a check pattern. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44884
[Bug c/44884] RX tst insn has been not fixed yet.
--- Comment #2 from dj at redhat dot com 2010-07-09 05:03 --- I've got a patch for it, just haven't sent it in yet. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg3.html too -- dj at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dj at redhat dot com |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-07-09 05:03:34 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44884
[Bug c/44884] RX tst insn has been not fixed yet.
--- Comment #3 from kazuhiro dot inaoka dot ud at renesas dot com 2010-07-09 05:09 --- Created an attachment (id=21155) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21155action=view) It's not enough case. The code that I expect is the following. _func: tst #4, r1 bne .L6 tst #1, r1 bne .L7 tst #2, r1 bne .L8 bra _f4 .L8: bra _f3 .L6: bra _f1 .L7: bra _f2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44884
[Bug c/44884] RX tst insn has been not fixed yet.
--- Comment #4 from dj at redhat dot com 2010-07-09 05:12 --- Right, I haven't sent the patch in yet. The other bug needs to be fixed first; the TST patch triggers an ICE otherwise. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44884
[Bug c/44884] RX tst insn has been not fixed yet.
--- Comment #5 from kazuhiro dot inaoka dot ud at renesas dot com 2010-07-09 05:24 --- (In reply to comment #4) Right, I haven't sent the patch in yet. The other bug needs to be fixed first; the TST patch triggers an ICE otherwise. Thank you for quick response, OK, I'm waiting for it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44884