[Bug c/65781] gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- We'll need to do something with the *.gcda version numbers for the new versioning scheme (because otherwise we'll run out of versions RSN), most likely to start somehow encoding the major number in the former major and minor characters and leave the patchlevel character for say the (minor << 1) | patchlevel into the former patchlevel character, but then it would be better to always keep patchlevel at 0 or 1. So not sure if we want to use 5.0.2 for RC2...
[Bug c/65781] gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Sure.
[Bug c/65781] gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- To be honest, it is pretty confusing even to me. If 5.0.1 denotes RC1, then why not call it 5.0.1-20150412 ? Then RC2 would be denoted by 5.0.2, and so on. As a general rule, X.0.N, where N > 0 could always be release candidate number N.
[Bug c/65781] gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html . Basically 5.1.0 is the version for the released version 5.0.1 is for prereleases.
[Bug c/65781] gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is expected, GCC 5.1.0 is only when it is released.
