[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

2019-11-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|7.5 |8.4

--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener  ---
The GCC 7 branch is being closed, re-targeting to GCC 8.4.

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

2019-11-05 Thread david.bolvansky at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549

--- Comment #12 from Dávid Bolvanský  ---
This missed gcc 7.5 :/

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

2019-09-06 Thread david.bolvansky at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549

--- Comment #11 from Dávid Bolvanský  ---
Would be nice to fix this for the last release of GCC 7.

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

2019-08-27 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549

--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška  ---
@David: May I please remind this?

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

2019-08-04 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549

--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Dávid Bolvanský from comment #8)
> Why this annoying note cannot be disabled using 
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmisleading-indentation" ?

When a note associated with a warning can't be disabled with a pragma, that
usually means that someone forgot to check the return value of the warning()
call in GCC before calling inform(), but I dunno if that's the case here... 

> 
> So only solution is -Wno-misleading-indentation?

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

2019-08-01 Thread david.bolvansky at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549

Dávid Bolvanský  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot 
com

--- Comment #8 from Dávid Bolvanský  ---
Why this annoying note cannot be disabled using 
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmisleading-indentation" ?

So only solution is -Wno-misleading-indentation?

[Bug c/89549] [7/8/9/10 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

2019-06-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|2019-03-01 00:00:00 |2019-06-05
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška  ---
David, may I please remind you this issue?