[Bug debug/14022] asm() should start a new line table entry

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14022

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed|2005-12-20 18:28:59 |2024-1-23

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener  ---
It's still as reported AFAICS.

.loc 1 6 0
popq%rbp
.cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size   main, .-main
#APP
.text
 _sub:
 rts

.Letext0:
.section.debug_info,"",@progbits

[Bug debug/14022] asm() should start a new line table entry

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 
06:07 ---
Confirmed.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed||1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-15 06:07:42
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14022

[Bug debug/14022] asm() should start a new line table entry

[drow at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-09 15:36 
---
Fred's request makes perfect sense to me.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|WONTFIX |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14022

[Bug debug/14022] asm() should start a new line table entry

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-06 
05:24 ---
Add your own debuging info for asm outside a function, there is no way for gcc 
to know not to do that, 
anyways this is standard practice as usually you want the asm to recorded as 
some line and not none.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14022