[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com

--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com  2005-03-14 14:20 
---
(In reply to comment #1)
 Is there a reason why you are using stabs+, the default debuging format on 
solaris is dwarf-2 which 
 provides more information.

yes, file compiles with default format but doesn't with stabs+

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446


[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com

--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com  2005-03-14 14:23 
---
(In reply to comment #1)
 Is there a reason why you are using stabs+, the default debuging format on 
solaris is dwarf-2 which 
 provides more information.

stabs+ is used for compatibility issues with Wine

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446


[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-14 
14:27 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
 stabs+ is used for compatibility issues with Wine

So, even mywin (and cygwin) have both moved over to dwarf2.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446


[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com

--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com  2005-03-14 15:42 
---
Subject: Re:  invalid assembly with -gstabs+

Hi,

If I switch to default debug format, I get an internal compiler error in
another file that I guess would have to report as a different bug. I'll need
some time though to narrow down the file to something smaller.

Ivan


- Original Message - 
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: [Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+



 --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-14 14:27 ---
 (In reply to comment #7)
  stabs+ is used for compatibility issues with Wine

 So, even mywin (and cygwin) have both moved over to dwarf2.


 -- 


 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446

 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
 You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com  2005-03-14 15:42 
---
Subject: Re:  invalid assembly with -gstabs+

Hi,

If I switch to default debug format, I get an internal compiler error in
another file that I guess would have to report as a different bug. I'll need
some time though to narrow down the file to something smaller.

Ivan


- Original Message - 
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: [Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+



 --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-14 14:27 ---
 (In reply to comment #7)
  stabs+ is used for compatibility issues with Wine

 So, even mywin (and cygwin) have both moved over to dwarf2.


 -- 


 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446

 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
 You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.





-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446


[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-14 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com

--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com  2005-03-14 15:42 
---
Subject: Re:  invalid assembly with -gstabs+

Hi,

If I switch to default debug format, I get an internal compiler error in
another file that I guess would have to report as a different bug. I'll need
some time though to narrow down the file to something smaller.

Ivan


- Original Message - 
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: [Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+



 --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-14 14:27 ---
 (In reply to comment #7)
  stabs+ is used for compatibility issues with Wine

 So, even mywin (and cygwin) have both moved over to dwarf2.


 -- 


 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446

 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
 You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.




--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com  2005-03-14 15:42 
---
Subject: Re:  invalid assembly with -gstabs+

Hi,

If I switch to default debug format, I get an internal compiler error in
another file that I guess would have to report as a different bug. I'll need
some time though to narrow down the file to something smaller.

Ivan


- Original Message - 
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: [Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+



 --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-14 14:27 ---
 (In reply to comment #7)
  stabs+ is used for compatibility issues with Wine

 So, even mywin (and cygwin) have both moved over to dwarf2.


 -- 


 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446

 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
 You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.





-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446


[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-13 Thread ivanr at syncad dot com

--- Additional Comments From ivanr at syncad dot com  2005-03-14 00:03 
---
(In reply to comment #3)
 It's 4.1.0 if I read correctly.

Yes, actually it's 4.1.0 20050309



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446


[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-12 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-12 
23:15 ---
It's 4.1.0 if I read correctly.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
Summary|gcc-4.0.0 doesn't produce a |invalid assembly with -
   |valid assembler file.   |gstabs+
Version|4.0.0   |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446


[Bug debug/20446] invalid assembly with -gstabs+

2005-03-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-13 
05:31 ---
This is most likely the same problem as PR 18170, the error messages are 
similar.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20446