[Bug driver/30091] specs file: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' not documented
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 03:08 --- I have a patch to document '#' and '@'. I'll submit it shortly. Currently gcc.c and invoke.texi are mostly kept in sync. However I haven't audited to make sure they are fully in sync. Adding support for \f is probably more complicated than just changing skip_whitespace. I think it is fine to just leave the code as is; users can use multiple blank lines and also comments to separate chunks of spec files. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-01-21 03:08:03 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091
[Bug driver/30091] specs file: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' not documented
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 09:25 --- specs are an internal format really. It is very subject to change each release. Also some time in the future we might decide to get rid of the specs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091
[Bug driver/30091] specs file: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' not documented
--- Comment #1 from tschwinge at gnu dot org 2006-12-06 18:22 --- It is also not documented that `#COMMENT' can be used to embed comments. And `\f' (form feed, `^L') could be added to list of white space (in the skip_whitespace function): it's convenient to separate units in hand-made specs files by form feed characters. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091