[Bug driver/40624] gcc -v does not give useful --prefix on w32
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 18:27 --- Since the output of gcc -v depends on how GCC was configured, this is not a bug with GCC and really a bug with the way mingw's gcc was configured. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c |driver Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40624
[Bug driver/40624] gcc -v does not give useful --prefix on w32
--- Comment #3 from lennart dot borgman at gmail dot com 2009-07-02 18:29 --- pinskia, please explain why you marked this bug as invalid! -- lennart dot borgman at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40624
[Bug driver/40624] gcc -v does not give useful --prefix on w32
--- Comment #4 from lennart dot borgman at gmail dot com 2009-07-02 18:31 --- Ah, sorry, I did not see your comment. Could you advice how the MinGW team should configure the compilation? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40624
[Bug driver/40624] gcc -v does not give useful --prefix on w32
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 18:32 --- Because the FSF does not supply the binaries you are using so it is not a bug with GCC rather than the way it was configured. when configuring with --prefix=/mingw, it have to mean C:/mingw. Also GCC binaries are relocatable so the whole idea of using it to figure out the include directory is wrong. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40624
[Bug driver/40624] gcc -v does not give useful --prefix on w32
--- Comment #6 from lennart dot borgman at gmail dot com 2009-07-02 18:34 --- Thanks, I see. How can one then figure out the include path that a user has? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40624
[Bug driver/40624] gcc -v does not give useful --prefix on w32
--- Comment #7 from lennart dot borgman at gmail dot com 2009-07-03 00:35 --- I think I found an answer to my last question here: http://www.mingw.org/wiki/IncludePathHOWTO Now I only need to understand how to parse that output... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40624
