[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.0|13.3
[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:337dc58139595bd9ab4101b988078c5d54d8506a commit r13-8444-g337dc58139595bd9ab4101b988078c5d54d8506a Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Mon Dec 4 22:44:53 2023 +0100 Fortran: allow RESTRICT qualifier also for optional arguments [PR100988] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/100988 * gfortran.h (IS_PROC_POINTER): New macro. * trans-types.cc (gfc_sym_type): Use macro in determination if the restrict qualifier can be used for a dummy variable. Fix logic to allow the restrict qualifier also for optional arguments, and to not apply it to pointer or proc_pointer arguments. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/100988 * gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_6.f90: Adjust pattern. * gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_7.f90: Likewise. * gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_8.f90: Likewise. * gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90: Likewise. * gfortran.dg/pr100988.f90: New test. Co-authored-by: Tobias Burnus (cherry picked from commit 9c3a880feecf81c310b4ade210fbd7004c9aece7)
[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed in gcc-14.
[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c3a880feecf81c310b4ade210fbd7004c9aece7 commit r14-6191-g9c3a880feecf81c310b4ade210fbd7004c9aece7 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Mon Dec 4 22:44:53 2023 +0100 Fortran: allow RESTRICT qualifier also for optional arguments [PR100988] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/100988 * gfortran.h (IS_PROC_POINTER): New macro. * trans-types.cc (gfc_sym_type): Use macro in determination if the restrict qualifier can be used for a dummy variable. Fix logic to allow the restrict qualifier also for optional arguments, and to not apply it to pointer or proc_pointer arguments. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/100988 * gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_6.f90: Adjust pattern. * gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_7.f90: Likewise. * gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_8.f90: Likewise. * gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90: Likewise. * gfortran.dg/pr100988.f90: New test. Co-authored-by: Tobias Burnus
[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2023-December/059985.html
[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 56781 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56781=edit Improved patch When looking at testcases, it appeared that POINTER attributes of CLASS dummy arguments were not properly handled. This is fixed by the attached patch. @Tobias: may I proceed with this PR, or is there something else I am missing?
[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-09 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1
[Bug fortran/100988] Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 53699 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
