[Bug fortran/102716] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2021-10-12 Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Moving the check on the KIND argument seems to fix this (not regtested): diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c index 677209ee95e..cfaf9d26bbc 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/check.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/check.c @@ -5086,6 +5086,13 @@ gfc_check_shape (gfc_expr *source, gfc_expr *kind) if (gfc_invalid_null_arg (source)) return false; + if (!kind_check (kind, 1, BT_INTEGER)) +return false; + if (kind && !gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2003, "%qs intrinsic " + "with KIND argument at %L", + gfc_current_intrinsic, &kind->where)) +return false; + if (source->rank == 0 || source->expr_type != EXPR_VARIABLE) return true; @@ -5098,13 +5105,6 @@ gfc_check_shape (gfc_expr *source, gfc_expr *kind) return false; } - if (!kind_check (kind, 1, BT_INTEGER)) -return false; - if (kind && !gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2003, "%qs intrinsic " - "with KIND argument at %L", - gfc_current_intrinsic, &kind->where)) -return false; - return true; }
[Bug fortran/102716] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-October/056711.html
[Bug fortran/102716] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b115daf62d94337b3d0b2962b0bbbf005a450e0 commit r12-4414-g1b115daf62d94337b3d0b2962b0bbbf005a450e0 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Thu Oct 14 20:18:14 2021 +0200 Fortran: fix order of checks for the SHAPE intrinsic gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/102716 * check.c (gfc_check_shape): Reorder checks so that invalid KIND arguments can be detected. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/102716 * gfortran.dg/shape_10.f90: New test.
[Bug fortran/102716] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d97dbf60dda22e0668dc33ca3a536adcb0963a65 commit r11-9159-gd97dbf60dda22e0668dc33ca3a536adcb0963a65 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Thu Oct 14 20:18:14 2021 +0200 Fortran: fix order of checks for the SHAPE intrinsic gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/102716 * check.c (gfc_check_shape): Reorder checks so that invalid KIND arguments can be detected. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/102716 * gfortran.dg/shape_10.f90: New test. (cherry picked from commit 1b115daf62d94337b3d0b2962b0bbbf005a450e0)
[Bug fortran/102716] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bec9e43e1611b62732bf29763c3e8bddea480f62 commit r10-10231-gbec9e43e1611b62732bf29763c3e8bddea480f62 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Thu Oct 14 20:18:14 2021 +0200 Fortran: fix order of checks for the SHAPE intrinsic gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/102716 * check.c (gfc_check_shape): Reorder checks so that invalid KIND arguments can be detected. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/102716 * gfortran.dg/shape_10.f90: New test. (cherry picked from commit 1b115daf62d94337b3d0b2962b0bbbf005a450e0)
[Bug fortran/102716] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on mainline for gcc-12, and on 11- and 10-branch. Backporting to 9-branch would require manual fixup and is not worth the effort. Closing. Thanks for the report!
