https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103023

            Bug ID: 103023
           Summary: ICE (Segmentation fault) with !$OMP DECLARE SIMD(func)
                    linear(ref(u))
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: bartoldeman at users dot sourceforge.net
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 51717
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51717&action=edit
Test case for crash

For the following Fortran code gfortran gives a SIGSEGV (tested GCC 9.3,10.3
locally, 11.2 and trunk on Godbolt)

subroutine func(u,ndim)
  !$OMP DECLARE SIMD(func) linear(ref(u))
  integer, intent(in) :: ndim
  double precision, intent(in) :: u(ndim)
end subroutine func

Here's the output for 10.3:

$ gfortran -c -fopenmp-simd openfun2.f90
openfun2.f90:1:15:

    1 | subroutine func(u,ndim)
      |               1
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

0xc147cf crash_signal
        ../../gcc/toplev.c:328
0x948ae6 size_binop_loc(unsigned int, tree_code, tree_node*, tree_node*)
        ../../gcc/fold-const.c:1906
0x7b8258 gfc_trans_omp_clauses
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c:2324
0x7bb168 gfc_trans_omp_declare_simd(gfc_namespace*)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c:5838
0x77b767 gfc_create_function_decl(gfc_namespace*, bool)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:3069
0x77b767 gfc_generate_function_code(gfc_namespace*)
        ../../gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:6744
0x6f679e translate_all_program_units
        ../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:6306
0x6f679e gfc_parse_file()
        ../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:6567
0x74dfbf gfc_be_parse_file
        ../../gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:210
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
  • [Bug fortran/103023]... bartoldeman at users dot sourceforge.net via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to