[Bug fortran/103472] ICE in gfc_conv_ss_startstride, at fortran/trans-array.c:4527
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103472 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||14.0 Known to fail||13.2.0 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin --- The example from comment #0 is now rejected, which avoids the problem: comment_0.f90:3:15: 3 |print *, (a(1:1)) | 1 Warning: Lower array reference at (1) is out of bounds (1 > 0) in dimension 1 comment_0.f90:3:15: 3 |print *, (a(1:1)) | 1 Warning: Lower array reference at (1) is out of bounds (1 > 0) in dimension 1 comment_0.f90:3:15: 3 |print *, (a(1:1)) | 1 Error: index in dimension 1 is out of bounds at (1)
[Bug fortran/103472] ICE in gfc_conv_ss_startstride, at fortran/trans-array.c:4527
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103472 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-12 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #1) > We could workaround it by replacing warnings with errors. > Are there cases where we do want warnings, not errors? I would consider the testcase as invalid, so an error appears ok. But technically the lower bound of a is 1 and upper bound is 0, so the error message is a bit misleading. E.g. NAG gives: Error: pr103472-z1.f90, line 2: First subscript (1) is greater than upper bound (0) for array A
[Bug fortran/103472] ICE in gfc_conv_ss_startstride, at fortran/trans-array.c:4527
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103472 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin --- Created attachment 51982 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51982=edit draft patch We could workaround it by replacing warnings with errors. Are there cases where we do want warnings, not errors?
