[Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray

[vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033

Andre Vehreschild  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray

[pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033

Paul Thomas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
 Blocks||87477

--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas  ---
I'm onto it :-)

Paul


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
[Bug 87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

[Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray

[kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4

[Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray

[kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed||2023-06-02

--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed.

There is a check for F2023:C1103

C1103 (R1105) variable shall not be a coindexed object.

but that applies to something like 'associate(y => x[1])'.

gfortran needs to check that if 'x' in 'associate(y => x)'
is a coarray, that its codimension and corank are propagated to
'y'.

[Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray

[neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033

--- Comment #1 from Neil Carlson  ---
This must be related to PR78152