[Bug fortran/20896] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ambiguous interface not detected
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 12:26 --- I think this effectively a duplicate of PR 34004. The example of comment 0 is invalid (the specific functions have arguments which are not distinguishable per the Fortran standard, see PR 34004). That can distinguish them in practice does not count. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
[Bug fortran/20896] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ambiguous interface not detected
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 03:48 --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) Paul, what is the status on this one? ping? Go back to the thread on it. I did not seem able to satisfy the reviewer as to my interpretation of the standard; since I could not see any other, I let it drop. I'll unassign myself. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|pault at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu ||dot org Status|ASSIGNED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
[Bug fortran/20896] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ambiguous interface not detected
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-16 11:50 --- (In reply to comment #8) Paul, what is the status on this one? ping? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
[Bug fortran/20896] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ambiguous interface not detected
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 23:20 --- Paul, what is the status on this one? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
[Bug fortran/20896] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ambiguous interface not detected
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 09:55 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00145.html Do we have consensus yet on this? The standard is not exactly straight forward interpret. I'm not 100% sure. The standard is indeed not very clear about it. My feeling is that the standard forbids some of the things on the basis that the compiler is not required to check those, but I should study the patch and the standard again. With the patch the following is not ambiguous: + SUBROUTINE s2(p2) + interface + function p2 () + real p2 + end + end interface + END + SUBROUTINE s1(p1) + external p1 + END This is based on the following: the first one is a function (well, that's obvious) and the second one is a subroutine. But is this indeed clear? Without IMPLICIT NONE the second could be equally well a real function, or do I miss something subtle? -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at net-b dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
[Bug fortran/20896] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ambiguous interface not detected
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 20:41 --- What is the status on this now? After reviewing the standard I think I am in agreement with what this patch does. The standard is not exactly straight forward interpret. Do we have consensus yet on this? If so, I will commit for Paul. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
[Bug fortran/20896] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ambiguous interface not detected
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-03 18:05 --- Subject: Bug number PR20896 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00145.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
[Bug fortran/20896] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ambiguous interface not detected
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-02 14:23 --- Subject: Bug 20896 Author: pault Date: Tue Jan 2 14:23:36 2007 New Revision: 120342 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120342 Log: 2007-01-02 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20896 * interface.c (check_sym_interfaces): Remove call to resolve_global_procedure. gfortran.h : Remove prototype for resolve_global_procedure. resolve.c (resolve_global_procedure): Add static attribute to function declaration. 2007-01-02 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20896 * gfortran.dg/interface_10.f90: Remove. Removed: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_10.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
[Bug fortran/20896] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ambiguous interface not detected
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-27 16:38 --- I suppose that I had better accept it... Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2005-12-31 19:56:44 |2006-12-27 16:38:11 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
