[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2024-03-21 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 49565, which changed state.

Bug 49565 Summary: character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not 
DW_ATE_unsigned_char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
 Resolution|FIXED   |---

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2024-03-20 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 49565, which changed state.

Bug 49565 Summary: character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not 
DW_ATE_unsigned_char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2019-03-05 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 37826, which changed state.

Bug 37826 Summary: gfortran emits incorrect debug information if compiled with 
-finit-local-zero
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37826

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2019-01-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 87969, which changed state.

Bug 87969 Summary: -fcheck does not raise signal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87969

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2019-01-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 77865, which changed state.

Bug 77865 Summary: Regression: wrong debug information for gfortran pointers to 
structures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77865

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2019-01-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 63331, which changed state.

Bug 63331 Summary: Fortran -fcompare-debug issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2017-07-27 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 40040, which changed state.

Bug 40040 Summary: gfortran invalid DW_AT_location for overridable variables
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40040

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2016-11-16 Thread bernhard.heckel at intel dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 78059, which changed state.

Bug 78059 Summary: Pointer to variable length array, debug info
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78059

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2016-11-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 71906, which changed state.

Bug 71906 Summary: [6/7 Regression] Fortran allocatable strings debug info type 
size regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71906

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2016-07-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 68889, which changed state.

Bug 68889 Summary: Fortran/DWARF: Possible bug in the handling of 
DW_AT_associated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68889

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2015-10-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> Hi FX,
>
> are you planning to submit that patch?  It sounds like a good idea.

This patch seems to have been committed at least since 4.7.

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2015-08-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 41143, which changed state.

Bug 41143 Summary: Support DW_TAG_common_inclusion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41143

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2013-12-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

Bug 24546 depends on bug 37132, which changed state.

Bug 37132 Summary: Debug: No DW_TAG_namelist emitted for NAMELISTS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2013-06-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

Bug 24546 depends on bug 23280, which changed state.

Bug 23280 Summary: gfortran does not emit DW_AT_entry_point (dwarf-2) debugging 
info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23280

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2013-06-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

Bug 24546 depends on bug 29697, which changed state.

Bug 29697 Summary: gfortran should use TYPE_QUAL_CONST etc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29697

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2007-05-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-20 22:20 ---
(In reply to comment #7)

> PS: as a minor improvement, we might want to give numeric types a more
> Fortran-like name, with a patch such as the following:

...

Hi FX,

are you planning to submit that patch?  It sounds like a good idea.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2007-03-03 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-03 12:06 
---
Steven Bosscher had made significant progress on this, IIRC. Steven, what's the
status of your patches?

PS: as a minor improvement, we might want to give numeric types a more
Fortran-like name, with a patch such as the following:

Index: trans-types.c
===
--- trans-types.c   (revision 122038)
+++ trans-types.c   (working copy)
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@
 {
   type = gfc_build_int_type (&gfc_integer_kinds[index]);
   gfc_integer_types[index] = type;
-  snprintf (name_buf, sizeof(name_buf), "int%d",
+  snprintf (name_buf, sizeof(name_buf), "integer(kind=%d)",
gfc_integer_kinds[index].kind);
   PUSH_TYPE (name_buf, type);
 }
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@
 {
   type = gfc_build_logical_type (&gfc_logical_kinds[index]);
   gfc_logical_types[index] = type;
-  snprintf (name_buf, sizeof(name_buf), "logical%d",
+  snprintf (name_buf, sizeof(name_buf), "logical(kind=%d)",
gfc_logical_kinds[index].kind);
   PUSH_TYPE (name_buf, type);
 }
@@ -549,13 +549,13 @@
 {
   type = gfc_build_real_type (&gfc_real_kinds[index]);
   gfc_real_types[index] = type;
-  snprintf (name_buf, sizeof(name_buf), "real%d",
+  snprintf (name_buf, sizeof(name_buf), "real(kind=%d)",
gfc_real_kinds[index].kind);
   PUSH_TYPE (name_buf, type);

   type = gfc_build_complex_type (type);
   gfc_complex_types[index] = type;
-  snprintf (name_buf, sizeof(name_buf), "complex%d",
+  snprintf (name_buf, sizeof(name_buf), "complex(kind=%d)",
gfc_real_kinds[index].kind);
   PUSH_TYPE (name_buf, type);
 }


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||steven at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
   Last reconfirmed|2006-01-29 19:54:48 |2007-03-03 12:06:04
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2005-11-21 Thread woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com 


--- Comment #6 from woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com  2005-11-22 
03:49 ---
I ever opened an issue to request to add something to identify the main
function (such as Fortran MAIN__) in a program.  But that is deferred to DWARF
4.  So maybe now it is too late to add anything into DWARF 3.

Here is the link
http://dwarf.freestandards.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=050808.2&type=closed


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2005-11-21 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-21 16:01 ---
Just as a general note, the deadline for dwarf3 comments is Dec 1, 2005.  So if
anyone with some clue about how to improve support for debugging fortran has
some good suggestions that would require changes in the debug format, now is
the time to send them.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2005-11-11 Thread woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com 


--- Comment #4 from woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com  2005-11-11 
09:18 ---
Hi Andrew,

I opened PR 24790 to track this.  Wish that it is just what you thought of. 
But I didn't figure out how to assign that to you.  So I add you the cc list.

Regards
- Wu Zhou


-- 

woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||24790


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2005-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-10 04:04 ---
There is a gfortran bug not listed here yet (I am too lazy to file a new bug).
Anyways the bug is that the type for arguments is wrong and gives you instead a
reference (in the C++ sense) type instead of a normal type.  I think I might
have a way to fix that.  If someone wants to file that bug and assign it to me,
that would be nice.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2005-10-27 Thread woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com 


--- Comment #2 from woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com  2005-10-28 
04:51 ---
Yes. Some of these problems stems from gdb, like 24527; others from gfortran,
like 22244, and yet others involve both. 

I could spare some time to work on fortran support in gdb.  And very willing to
work with gfortran community to make progress on that.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2005-10-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-27 23:32 ---
>From the looks of it, some of these are really gdb issues as they work when you
do:
set lang c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546

[Bug fortran/24546] [meta-bug] gfortran debugging problems

2005-10-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-10-27 23:13:05
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546