[Bug fortran/24755] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error with statement function
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24755
[Bug fortran/24755] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error with statement function
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 05:42 --- Fixed on mainline and 4.0 -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24755
[Bug fortran/24755] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error with statement function
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 05:37 --- Subject: Bug 24755 Author: pault Date: Fri Nov 11 05:37:40 2005 New Revision: 106779 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106779 Log: 2005-11-11 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/24655 PR fortran/24755 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Add checks that symtree exists for the expression to weed out inline intrinsic functions and parameters. PR fortran/24409 PR fortran/16861 * module.c (mio_component_ref): Return if the symbol is NULL and wait for another iteration during module reads. (mio_symtree_ref): Suppress the writing of contained symbols, when a symbol is available in the main namespace. Take care that a symbol is not substituted for by a the symbol for the module itself and prevent the promotion of a formal argument. (read_module): Give symbols for variables from contained module procedures different true_name entries to those from the module proper. 2005-11-11 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/24655 PR fortran/24755 * gfortran.dg/recursive_statement_functions.f90: Add statement functions using inline intrinsic functions and parameters to test that they no longer seg-fault. PR fortran/24409 * gfortran.dg/nested_modules_4.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/nested_modules_5.f90: New test. PR fortran/16861 * gfortran.dg/nested_modules_3.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/nested_modules_2.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_modules_2.f90 branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_modules_3.f90 branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_modules_4.f90 branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_modules_5.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/fortran/module.c branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_modules_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_statement_functions.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24755
[Bug fortran/24755] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error with statement function
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 22:24 --- Subject: Bug 24755 Author: pault Date: Thu Nov 10 22:24:28 2005 New Revision: 106756 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106756 Log: 2005-11-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/24655 PR fortran/24755 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Add checks that symtree exists for the expression to weed out inline intrinsic functions and parameters. PR fortran/24409 * module.c (mio_symtree_ref): Correct the patch of 0923 so that a symbol is not substituted for by a the symbol for the module itself and to prevent the promotion of a formal argument. 2005-11-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/24655 PR fortran/24755 * gfortran.dg/recursive_statement_functions.f90: Add statement functions using inline intrinsic functions and parameters to test that they no longer seg-fault. PR fortran/24409 gfortran.dg/nested_modules_4.f90: New test. gfortran.dg/nested_modules_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_modules_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nested_modules_5.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/module.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_statement_functions.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24755
[Bug fortran/24755] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error with statement function
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2005-11-10
10:32 ---
I have a patch for this, which is regtesting now and will be submitted at
lunchtime.
Apologies for letting this regression through; please give the patch a try.
Paul T
Index: gcc/gcc/fortran/match.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/match.c,v
retrieving revision 1.47
diff -c -p -r1.47 match.c
*** gcc/gcc/fortran/match.c 17 Oct 2005 20:52:36 - 1.47
--- gcc/gcc/fortran/match.c 10 Nov 2005 10:29:15 -
*** recursive_stmt_fcn (gfc_expr *e, gfc_sym
*** 2721,2727
if (sym->name == arg->name
|| recursive_stmt_fcn (arg->expr, sym))
return true;
! }
/* Check the name before testing for nested recursion! */
if (sym->name == e->symtree->n.sym->name)
--- 2721,2730
if (sym->name == arg->name
|| recursive_stmt_fcn (arg->expr, sym))
return true;
! }
!
! if (e->symtree == NULL)
! return false;
/* Check the name before testing for nested recursion! */
if (sym->name == e->symtree->n.sym->name)
*** recursive_stmt_fcn (gfc_expr *e, gfc_sym
*** 2736,2742
break;
case EXPR_VARIABLE:
! if (sym->name == e->symtree->n.sym->name)
return true;
break;
--- 2739,2745
break;
case EXPR_VARIABLE:
! if (e->symtree && sym->name == e->symtree->n.sym->name)
return true;
break;
Index: gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_statement_functions.f90
===
RCS file:
/cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_statement_functions.f90,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -c -p -r1.1 recursive_statement_functions.f90
*** gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_statement_functions.f90 17 Oct
2005 20:52:37 - 1.1
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_statement_functions.f90 10 Nov
2005 10:28:58 -
***
*** 1,16
! { dg-do compile }
! PR20866 - A statement function cannot be recursive.
! Contributed by Joost VandeVondele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
! INTEGER :: i, st1, st2, st3
REAL :: x, z(2,2)
! character*8 :: ch
!
! Test check for recursion via other statement functions, string
! length references, function actual arguments and array index
! references.
! st1(i)=len(ch(st2(1):8))
! st2(i)=max (st3(1), 4)
! st3(i)=2 + cos (z(st1 (1), i)) ! { dg-error "is recursive" }
! write(6,*) st1(1)
END
--- 1,32
! { dg-do compile }
! PR20866 - A statement function cannot be recursive.
! Contributed by Joost VandeVondele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
! !
! ! Modified 20051110 to check that regressions PR24655 and PR24755
! ! are fixed. Thanks to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
! ! the tests.
! !
! INTEGER :: i, st1, st2, st3, lambda, n
REAL :: x, z(2,2)
! character(8) :: ch
! real(8) :: fi, arg, sigma, dshpfunc
! real(8), parameter :: one=1d0
!
! Test check for recursion via other statement functions, string
! length references, function actual arguments and array index
! references.
! !
! st1 (i) = len (ch(st2 (1):8))
! st2 (i) = max (st3 (1), 4)
! st3 (i) = 2 + cos (z(st1 (1), i)) ! { dg-error "is recursive" }
! !
! ! Test the two regressions.
! !
! fi (n) = n *one
! dshpfunc (arg)=-lambda/sigma*(arg/sigma)**(lambda-1)*exp
(-(arg/sigma)**lambda)
! !
! ! References to each statement function.
! !
! write(6,*) st1 (1), fi (2), dshpfunc (1.0_8)
END
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24755
[Bug fortran/24755] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error with statement function
--- Comment #3 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 18:40 --- *** Bug 24655 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pavarini at pv dot infn dot ||it http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24755
[Bug fortran/24755] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error with statement function
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 13:17 --- Since recursive_stmt_fcn is involved, this looks like my doing! I'll take a look tomorrow morning. Paul T -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24755
[Bug fortran/24755] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error with statement function
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 11:44 --- Confirmed, backtrace: #0 0x080727d3 in recursive_stmt_fcn (e=0x9fec3b8, sym=0x9fec218) at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/fortran/match.c:2727 #1 0x080727b5 in recursive_stmt_fcn (e=0x9fec540, sym=0x9fec218) at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/fortran/match.c:2744 #2 0x080727b5 in recursive_stmt_fcn (e=0x9fec818, sym=0x9fec218) at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/fortran/match.c:2744 #3 0x080727b5 in recursive_stmt_fcn (e=0x9fecb70, sym=0x9fec218) at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/fortran/match.c:2744 #4 0x080727b5 in recursive_stmt_fcn (e=0x9fecbc8, sym=0x9fec218) at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/fortran/match.c:2744 #5 0x08074349 in gfc_match_st_function () at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/fortran/match.c:2819 #6 0x0807c2ba in match_word (str=, subr=0x8074270 , old_locus=0xbfdffc08) at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/fortran/parse.c:65 #7 0x0807c3ac in decode_statement () at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/fortran/parse.c:132 #8 0x0807cda5 in next_statement () at /home/peshtigo/pinskia/src/gnu/gcc/src/gcc/fortran/parse.c:356 # -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail||4.1.0 4.0.3 Known to work||4.0.1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-11-09 11:44:05 date|| Summary|internal compiler error with|[4.0/4.1 Regression] |statement function |internal compiler error with ||statement function http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24755
