[Bug fortran/26834] gfc_todo: Not Implemented: Unable to determine rank of expression

2006-04-12 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr


--- Comment #2 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr  2006-04-12 
14:32 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed, PR 25669 and bug 18003 are very closely related (it might turn out
> this is a dup of one of them).

They are indeed the same.  Attached below is a patch that fixes all three and a
testcase that demonstrates that this is so.  The patch is still testing but I
am pretty sure it is OK (ie. this is a path that ICEd previously).  I will
submit tonight, if all is well.

Paul

Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c   (révision 112853)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-array.c   (copie de travail)
@@ -2393,6 +2393,19 @@
  loop->dimen = ss->data.info.dimen;
  break;

+   /* Cope with the likes of PRINT *, lbound (a), where nothing
+  better is available.  */
+   case GFC_SS_INTRINSIC:
+ switch (ss->expr->value.function.isym->generic_id)
+   {
+   case GFC_ISYM_LBOUND:
+   case GFC_ISYM_UBOUND:
+ loop->dimen = ss->data.info.dimen;
+
+   default:
+ break;
+   }
+
default:
  break;
}
@@ -2418,6 +2431,15 @@
gfc_conv_section_startstride (loop, ss, n);
  break;

+   case GFC_SS_INTRINSIC:
+ switch (ss->expr->value.function.isym->generic_id)
+   {
+   case GFC_ISYM_LBOUND:
+   case GFC_ISYM_UBOUND:
+ break;
+   default:
+ continue;
+   }
case GFC_SS_CONSTRUCTOR:
case GFC_SS_FUNCTION:
  for (n = 0; n < ss->data.info.dimen; n++)
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c   (révision 112853)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c   (copie de travail)
@@ -3710,6 +3710,7 @@
   newss->type = GFC_SS_INTRINSIC;
   newss->expr = expr;
   newss->next = ss;
+  newss->data.info.dimen = 1;

   return newss;
 }

! { dg-do compile }
! This tests the fix for PRs 26834, 25669 and 18803, in which
! shape information for the lbound and ubound intrinsics was not
! transferred to the scalarizer.  For this reason, an ICE would
! ensue, whenever these functions were used in temporaries.
!
! The tests are lifted from the PRs and some further checks are
! done to make sure that nothing is broken.
!
! This is PR26834
subroutine gfcbug34 ()
  implicit none
  type t
 integer, pointer :: i (:) => NULL ()
  end type t
  type(t), save :: gf
  allocate (gf%i(20))
  write(*,*) 'ubound:', ubound (gf% i)
  write(*,*) 'lbound:', lbound (gf% i)
end subroutine gfcbug34

! This is PR25669
subroutine foo (a)
  real a(*)
  call bar (a, LBOUND(a),2)
end subroutine foo
subroutine bar (b, i, j)
  real b(i:j)
  print *, i, j
  print *, b(i:j)
end subroutine bar

! This is PR18003
subroutine io_bug()
  integer :: a(10)
  print *, ubound(a)
end subroutine io_bug

! This checks that lbound and ubound are OK in  temporary
! expressions.
subroutine io_bug_plus()
  integer :: a(10, 10), b(2)
  print *, ubound(a)*(/1,2/)
  print *, (/1,2/)*ubound(a)
end subroutine io_bug_plus

  character(4) :: ch(2), ech(2) = (/'ABCD', 'EFGH'/)
  real(4) :: a(2)
  equivalence (ech,a)
  integer(1) :: i(8) = (/(j, j = 1,8)/)

! Check that the bugs have gone
  call io_bug ()
  call io_bug_plus ()
  call foo ((/1.0,2.0,3.0/))
  call gfcbug34 ()

! Check that we have not broken other intrinsics.
  print *, cos ((/1.0,2.0/))
  print *, transfer (a, ch)
  print *, i(1:4) * transfer (a, i, 4) * 2
end


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26834



[Bug fortran/26834] gfc_todo: Not Implemented: Unable to determine rank of expression

2006-04-12 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org


--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org  2006-04-12 19:55 ---
Subject: Bug number PR26834

A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00469.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26834



[Bug fortran/26834] gfc_todo: Not Implemented: Unable to determine rank of expression

2006-04-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26834



[Bug fortran/26834] gfc_todo: Not Implemented: Unable to determine rank of expression

2006-04-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 26834

Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16  Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR fortran/26822
* intrinsic.c (add_functions): Mark LOGICAL as elemental.

PR fortran/26787
* expr.c (gfc_check_assign): Extend scope of error to include
assignments to a procedure in the main program or, from a
module or internal procedure that is not that represented by
the lhs symbol. Use VARIABLE rather than l-value in message.

PR fortran/27096
* trans-array.c (gfc_trans_deferred_array): If the backend_decl
is not a descriptor, dereference and then test and use the type.

PR fortran/25597
* trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Check if an array
result, is also automatic character length.  If so, process
the character length.

PR fortran/18803
PR fortran/25669
PR fortran/26834
* trans_intrinsic.c (gfc_walk_intrinsic_bound): Set
data.info.dimen for bound intrinsics.
* trans_array.c (gfc_conv_ss_startstride): Pick out LBOUND and
UBOUND intrinsics and supply their shape information to the ss
and the loop.

PR fortran/27124
* trans_expr.c (gfc_trans_function_call):  Add a new block, post,
in to which all the argument post blocks are put.  Add this block
to se->pre after a byref call or to se->post, otherwise.

2006-04-16  Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR fortran/26787
* gfortran.dg/proc_assign_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/procedure_lvalue.f90: Change message.
* gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90: Add new error.

PR fortran/27096
* gfortran.dg/auto_pointer_array_result_1.f90

PR fortran/27089
* gfortran.dg/specification_type_resolution_1.f90

PR fortran/18803
PR fortran/25669
PR fortran/26834
* gfortran.dg/bounds_temporaries_1.f90: New test.

PR fortran/27124
* gfortran.dg/array_return_value_1.f90: New test.



Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_return_value_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/auto_char_pointer_array_result_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/auto_pointer_array_result_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_temporaries_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_assign_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/specification_type_resolution_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/procedure_lvalue.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26834



[Bug fortran/26834] gfc_todo: Not Implemented: Unable to determine rank of expression

2006-04-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 26834

Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23  Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR fortran/27122
* resolve.c (resolve_function): Remove general restriction on auto
character length function interfaces.
(gfc_resolve_uops): Check restrictions on defined operator
procedures.
(resolve_types): Call the check for defined operators.

PR fortran/27113
* trans-array.c (get_array_ctor_var_strlen): Remove typo in enum.
Part of the fix in 4.2, which does not work in 4.1 because the
divergence is now too great.

PR fortran/26822
* intrinsic.c (add_functions): Mark LOGICAL as elemental.

PR fortran/26787
* expr.c (gfc_check_assign): Extend scope of error to include
assignments to a procedure in the main program or, from a
module or internal procedure that is not that represented by
the lhs symbol. Use VARIABLE rather than l-value in message.

PR fortran/25597
* trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Check if an array
result, is also automatic character length.  If so, process
the character length. Note that this fixes the bug in 4.2
but not here in 4.1 because the trees have diverged too much.
Manifestly correct, so applied anyway.

PR fortran/18803
PR fortran/25669
PR fortran/26834
* trans_intrinsic.c (gfc_walk_intrinsic_bound): Set
data.info.dimen for bound intrinsics.
* trans_array.c (gfc_conv_ss_startstride): Pick out LBOUND and
UBOUND intrinsics and supply their shape information to the ss
and the loop.

PR fortran/27124
* trans_expr.c (gfc_trans_function_call):  Add a new block, post,
in to which all the argument post blocks are put.  Add this block
to se->pre after a byref call or to se->post, otherwise.

2006-04-23  Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR fortran/27122
* gfortran.dg/defined_operators_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/assumed_charlen_function_1.f90: Add new error and
remove old ones associated, incorrectly, with Note 5.46.

PR fortran/26787
* gfortran.dg/proc_assign_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/procedure_lvalue.f90: Change message.
* gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90: Add new error.

PR fortran/27089
* gfortran.dg/specification_type_resolution_1.f90

PR fortran/18803
PR fortran/25669
PR fortran/26834
* gfortran.dg/bounds_temporaries_1.f90: New test.

PR fortran/27124
* gfortran.dg/array_return_value_1.f90: New test.



Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_return_value_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_temporaries_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/defined_operators_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_assign_1.f90
   
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/specification_type_resolution_1.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/expr.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
   
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_charlen_function_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/procedure_lvalue.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26834



[Bug fortran/26834] gfc_todo: Not Implemented: Unable to determine rank of expression

2006-04-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-23 05:43 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26834



[Bug fortran/26834] gfc_todo: Not Implemented: Unable to determine rank of expression

2006-03-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-23 22:45 ---
Confirmed, PR 25669 and bug 18003 are very closely related (it might turn out
this is a dup of one of them).


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||18003, 25669
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-03-23 22:45:05
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26834