[Bug fortran/27874] Bad interaction between bounds checking, forall and derived types

2006-07-24 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-24 21:04 
---
Fixed.


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
  Known to fail|4.1.2   |
  Known to work|4.2.0   |4.2.0 4.1.2
 Resolution||FIXED
Summary|[4.1 only] Bad interaction  |Bad interaction between
   |between bounds checking,|bounds checking, forall and
   |forall and derived types|derived types


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27874

[Bug fortran/27874] Bad interaction between bounds checking, forall and derived types

2006-07-06 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-06 17:12 
---
Subject: Bug 27874

Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Jul  6 17:12:25 2006
New Revision: 115224

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115224
Log:
PR fortran/27874
* trans-stmt.c (compute_inner_temp_size): Don't perform bounds
checking when calculating the bounds of scalarization.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27874

[Bug fortran/27874] Bad interaction between bounds checking, forall and derived types

2006-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
   ||patches/2006-
   ||07/msg00140.html
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Keywords||patch
   Last reconfirmed|2006-06-02 16:39:07 |2006-07-05 13:37:13
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27874

[Bug fortran/27874] Bad interaction between bounds checking, forall and derived types

2006-06-03 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-03 11:41 
---
Created an attachment (id=11588)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11588action=view)
Code generated for testcase

See the code generated for this testcase (with my recent patch for improved
out-of-bounds messages). In order to create a temporary, we first run the i=1:1
loop once, without the conditionnal mask (which in this case is .false.), to
count the total length needed for the temporary (variable num.5). When doing
this, we perform bounds checking on elements that will not be used in the final
loop.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27874

[Bug fortran/27874] Bad interaction between bounds checking, forall and derived types

2006-06-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-02 16:39 ---
Confirmed.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-06-02 16:39:07
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27874