[Bug fortran/29786] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Initialization of overlapping variables: Not implemented
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-11 22:39 --- Subject: Bug 29786 Author: pault Date: Mon Jun 11 22:39:21 2007 New Revision: 125628 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125628 Log: 2007-06-12 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/29786 PR fortran/30875 * trans-common.c (get_init_field): New function. (create_common): Call get_init_field for overlapping initializers in equivalence blocks. * resolve.c (resolve_equivalence_derived, resolve_equivalence): Remove constraints on initializers in equivalence blocks. * target-memory.c (expr_to_char, gfc_merge_initializers): New functions. (encode_derived): Add the bit offset to the byte offset to get the total offset to the field. * target-memory.h : Add prototype for gfc_merge_initializers. 2007-06-12 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/29786 * gfortran.dg/equiv_7.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/equiv_constraint_7.f90: Change error message. PR fortran/30875 * gfortran.dg/equiv_constraint_5.f90: Correct code and error. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_7.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/fortran/target-memory.c trunk/gcc/fortran/target-memory.h trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_constraint_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_constraint_7.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29786
[Bug fortran/29786] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Initialization of overlapping variables: Not implemented
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-11 22:41 --- fixed on trunk Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29786
[Bug fortran/29786] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Initialization of overlapping variables: Not implemented
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-24 08:10 --- Just to let you all know; I have had a patch ready for this and PR30875 for somewhile. This was awaiting the commit of Brook's simplify_transfer patch and all the machinery in target-memory.c. Well, during the wait it suffered a bit of x86_ia64 specific bit-rot, whose cause I just do not see right now. Ia m working on it, though:) Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29786
[Bug fortran/29786] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Initialization of overlapping variables: Not implemented
--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-05-24 13:57 --- Subject: Bug number PR29786 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg01609.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29786
[Bug fortran/29786] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Initialization of overlapping variables: Not implemented
--- Comment #9 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 20:49 --- I'm changing the name of this bug to make it a lot easier to find, now that we know what the actual problem is. Also, PR #31672 contains an excellent testcase for this, which I'll quote here: -- function d1mach(i) implicit none double precision d1mach,dmach(5) integer i,large(4),small(4) equivalence ( dmach(1), small(1) ) equivalence ( dmach(2), large(1) ) data small(1),small(2) / 0, 1048576/ data large(1),large(2) /-1,2146435071/ d1mach = 0.0d0 end function d1mach -- -- brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]|[4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] |rejects equivalence |Initialization of ||overlapping variables: Not ||implemented http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29786
[Bug fortran/29786] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Initialization of overlapping variables: Not implemented
-- brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P5 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29786
[Bug fortran/29786] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Initialization of overlapping variables: Not implemented
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 21:50 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-23 20:51:45 PriorityP5 P2 The release manager is the only one who is able to change the priority. Changing the Priority back to P5 based on this is a fortran bug so not blocking the release. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29786