[Bug fortran/31472] gfortran does not detect the illegal use of an access specification in a program, subroutine, or function

2007-04-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-04 18:47 ---
Accepted. Thanks for the report.

We do check for this but only for the PRIVATE/PUBLIC attribute and not for the
PUBLIC/PRIVATE statement.

Patch:

Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c  (Revision 123494)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c  (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -3916,6 +3916,13 @@
   if (gfc_match ("private") != MATCH_YES)
 return MATCH_NO;

+  if (gfc_current_state () != COMP_MODULE)
+{
+  gfc_error ("PRIVATE statement at %C is not allowed outside of "
+"a module");
+  return MATCH_ERROR;
+}
+
   if (gfc_current_state () == COMP_DERIVED)
 {
   if (gfc_match_eos () == MATCH_YES)
@@ -3946,6 +3953,13 @@
   if (gfc_match ("public") != MATCH_YES)
 return MATCH_NO;

+  if (gfc_current_state () != COMP_MODULE)
+{
+  gfc_error ("PUBLIC statement at %C is not allowed outside of "
+"a module");
+  return MATCH_ERROR;
+}
+
   if (gfc_match_eos () == MATCH_YES)
 {
   *st = ST_PUBLIC;


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||accepts-invalid
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-04 18:47:11
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31472

[Bug fortran/31472] gfortran does not detect the illegal use of an access specification in a program, subroutine, or function

2007-04-05 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-05 14:13 ---
The patch is wrong since the PRIVATE/PUBLIC statement is also allowed for type:

module foo
type t
  private
  integer, public :: foo
end type t
end module foo

Actually, currently gfortran also invalidly rejects the "integer, public ::
foo". See NOTE 4.41 in Section 4.5.3.6 of the Fortran 2003 standard for an
example.


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||rejects-valid


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31472

[Bug fortran/31472] gfortran does not detect the illegal use of an access specification in a program, subroutine, or function

2007-04-11 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-11 09:44 ---
Fortran 95
--
4.4.1 Derived-type definition
TYPE [ [ , access-spec ] :: ] type-name
   [ private-sequence-stmt ] ! no PUBLIC!

access spec & PRIVATE statement only in specification part of a module.

5.1 Type declaration statements / 5.1.2.2 Accessibility attribute
type-spec, access-spec :: ...

only in specification part of a module

5.2.3 Accessibility statements
access-spec [ [ :: ] access-id-list ]

only in specification part of a module.


Fortran 2003


4.5.1 Derived-type definition
TYPE access-spec :: type-name
  PRIVATE ! statement; no PUBLIC
  declaration-type-spec [[,component-attr-spec-list]::]component-decl-list
with "component-attr-spec" is [...] or "access-spec".


Difference F95/F2003:
- components of a derived-type may have access-spec attributes
- Note that the PUBLIC statement and and the "PRIVATE [::] access-id-list"
statement (but not "PRIVATE" w/o access-id-list) is not allowed in a
derived-type declaration.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31472

[Bug fortran/31472] gfortran does not detect the illegal use of an access specification in a program, subroutine, or function

2007-04-11 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org 


--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org  2007-04-11 16:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 31472

A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00558.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31472

[Bug fortran/31472] gfortran does not detect the illegal use of an access specification in a program, subroutine, or function

2007-04-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-12 09:46 ---
Subject: Bug 31472

Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 12 09:46:30 2007
New Revision: 123735

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123735
Log:
2007-04-12  Tobias Burnus  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR fortran/31472
* decl.c (match_attr_spec): Allow PRIVATE/PUBLIC
attribute in type definitions.
(gfc_match_private): Allow PRIVATE statement only
in specification part of modules.
(gfc_match_public): Ditto for PUBLIC.
(gfc_match_derived_decl): Allow PRIVATE/PUBLIC attribute only in
specificification part of modules.

2007-04-12  Tobias Burnus  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR fortran/31472
* gfortran.dg/access_spec_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/access_spec_2.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/non_module_public.f90: Match new error message.


Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/access_spec_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/access_spec_2.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/decl.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/non_module_public.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31472

[Bug fortran/31472] gfortran does not detect the illegal use of an access specification in a program, subroutine, or function

2007-04-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-12 09:58 ---
Fixed in 4.3. No regression and rejects only valid Fortran 2003 code -> no
backporting to 4.2 -> Fixed.


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31472