[Bug fortran/31615] testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90

2007-05-18 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #8 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-19 06:02 ---
fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg00150.html

by this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01733.html


-- 

ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31615

[Bug fortran/31615] testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90

2007-04-25 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-25 18:14 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 ah, ok. so, in that case we probably want to just change the '3' to '2' in the
 above test:
 Index: testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90
 ===
 --- testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90   (revision 123954)
 +++ testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90   (working copy)
 @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
  ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1 vect  } }
  ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using 
 peeling
 1 vect { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
  ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Vectorizing an unaligned access 1 
 vect
 { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
 -! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using
 versioning. 3 vect { target { ilp32  vect_no_align } } } }
 +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using
 versioning. 2 vect { target { ilp32  vect_no_align } } } }
  ! We also expect to vectorize one loop for lp64 targets that support
  ! misaligned access:

Are you going to submit/install your patch?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31615

[Bug fortran/31615] testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90

2007-04-25 Thread dorit at il dot ibm dot com 


--- Comment #7 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com  2007-04-25 21:30 ---
 Are you going to submit/install your patch?

yes, I'll go ahead and submit the patch


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31615

[Bug fortran/31615] testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90

2007-04-19 Thread dorit at il dot ibm dot com 


--- Comment #5 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com  2007-04-19 07:27 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 (In reply to comment #3)
  But then I wonder why we don't see the same failure on ia64?
 Because the failing part of the testcase is only done on ilp32 targets:
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using
 versioning. 3 vect { target { ilp32  vect_no_align
 } } } }

ah, ok. so, in that case we probably want to just change the '3' to '2' in the
above test:

Index: testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90
===
--- testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90   (revision 123954)
+++ testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90   (working copy)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1 vect  } }
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using peeling
1 vect { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Vectorizing an unaligned access 1 vect
{ xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using
versioning. 3 vect { target { ilp32  vect_no_align } } } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using
versioning. 2 vect { target { ilp32  vect_no_align } } } }

 ! We also expect to vectorize one loop for lp64 targets that support
 ! misaligned access:


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31615

[Bug fortran/31615] testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90

2007-04-18 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-18 07:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=13387)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13387action=view)
Dump file using -fdump-tree-vect-details

Created dump file using -fdump-tree-vect-details


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31615

[Bug fortran/31615] testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90

2007-04-18 Thread dorit at il dot ibm dot com 


--- Comment #3 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com  2007-04-18 10:18 ---
 Created dump file using -fdump-tree-vect-details

thanks. So I don't understand why we expect to version for 3 different
data-references, since there are only 2 in the loop that is vectorized. But
then I wonder why we don't see the same failure on ia64?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31615

[Bug fortran/31615] testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90

2007-04-18 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #4 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-19 05:11 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 But then I wonder why we don't see the same failure on ia64?

Because the failing part of the testcase is only done on ilp32 targets:

! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced using
versioning. 3 vect { target { ilp32  vect_no_align
} } } }


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31615

[Bug fortran/31615] testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90

2007-04-17 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-18 06:35:48
   date||
Summary|testsuite failure in|testsuite failure in
   |gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 |gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31615

[Bug fortran/31615] testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90

2007-04-17 Thread dorit at il dot ibm dot com 


--- Comment #1 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com  2007-04-18 06:42 ---
could you please provide the .vect dump file, as generated with
-fdump-tree-vect-details?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31615