[Bug fortran/32137] [4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs on powerpc-apple
--- Comment #2 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-29 07:35 --- Update: This isn't a regression; the testcase is new. -- brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.3 regression]|[4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs |func_result_3.f90 ICEs on |on powerpc-apple |powerpc-apple | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32137
[Bug fortran/32137] [4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs on powerpc-apple
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-29 07:51 --- Test case came from PR32088. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32137
[Bug fortran/32137] [4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs on powerpc-apple
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-29 08:16 --- The error is in gfc_trans_dummy_array_bias, where the assert fails: gcc_assert (GFC_ARRAY_TYPE_P (type)); The question is: Why does it fail on powerpc-apple but not on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32137
[Bug fortran/32137] [4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs on powerpc-apple
--- Comment #5 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-29 18:45 --- As of SVN 125160, this is working again. Weird, indeed. I guess I'll close it as a chimera. -- brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32137