[Bug fortran/32137] [4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs on powerpc-apple

[brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-29 07:35 ---
Update: This isn't a regression; the testcase is new.


-- 

brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[4.3 regression]|[4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs
   |func_result_3.f90 ICEs on   |on powerpc-apple
   |powerpc-apple   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32137

[Bug fortran/32137] [4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs on powerpc-apple

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-29 07:51 ---
Test case came from PR32088.


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32137

[Bug fortran/32137] [4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs on powerpc-apple

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-29 08:16 ---
The error is in gfc_trans_dummy_array_bias, where the assert fails:

  gcc_assert (GFC_ARRAY_TYPE_P (type));

The question is: Why does it fail on powerpc-apple but not on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32137

[Bug fortran/32137] [4.3] func_result_3.f90 ICEs on powerpc-apple

[brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-29 18:45 ---
As of SVN 125160, this is working again.  Weird, indeed.

I guess I'll close it as a chimera.


-- 

brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32137