[Bug fortran/32738] Error: Function 'tree_size' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-19 21:11 --- Subject: Bug 32738 Author: dfranke Date: Thu Jul 19 21:11:38 2007 New Revision: 126790 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126790 Log: 2007-07-19 Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/32738 * gfortran.dg/pr32768.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr32738.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32738
[Bug fortran/32738] Error: Function 'tree_size' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-19 21:12 --- Assuming fixed. Added the testcase to the testsuite (r126790). Closing as WORKSFORME. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32738
[Bug fortran/32738] Error: Function 'tree_size' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
--- Comment #3 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2007-07-16 14:33 --- (In reply to comment #2) I'm not marking it a duplicate as it might have a different reason; as I don't get a failure here indicates however that it is indeed a duplicate. Works here as well. Michael, can you confirm? All I know is the bug exists in the snapshot versions of gfortran v4.3 dated July 11 and 12. It does not exist in earlier or later snapshots of gfortran v4.3. It does not exist in the snapshot version of gfortran v4.2.1 dated July 12. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32738
[Bug fortran/32738] Error: Function 'tree_size' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-14 13:37 --- I'm not marking it a duplicate as it might have a different reason; as I don't get a failure here indicates however that it is indeed a duplicate. Works here as well. Michael, can you confirm? Tobias, should the testcases be added to the testsuite nonetheless? To make sure we don't regress again if perchance it wasn't a dupe? -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32738
[Bug fortran/32738] Error: Function 'tree_size' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 18:24 --- New error message, but probably same reason. As I wrote in another PR: This seems to be a duplicate of PR 32727. Note that the offending patch (for PR32634) has been reverted and therefore this should not fail anymore. I'm not marking it a duplicate as it might have a different reason; as I don't get a failure here indicates however that it is indeed a duplicate. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32738
