[Bug fortran/35944] [4.3, 4.4 regression] wrong result for MOD with kind=10 for some array argument values

2008-04-16 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com


--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2008-04-16 06:21 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 The tree dump for the kind=8 and kind=10 are exactly identical except for the
 call to __builtin_fmodl for kind=10 and __builtin_fmod for kind=8.
 
 It looks like fmodl is broken.

Can somebody provide equivalent c testcase? I will look into this problem.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35944



[Bug fortran/35944] [4.3, 4.4 regression] wrong result for MOD with kind=10 for some array argument values

2008-04-16 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com


--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2008-04-16 11:28 ---
(In reply to comment #3)

 Can somebody provide equivalent c testcase? I will look into this problem.

I have a patch in testing.


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |ubizjak at gmail dot com
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2008-04-15 21:02:35 |2008-04-16 11:28:36
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35944



[Bug fortran/35944] [4.3, 4.4 regression] wrong result for MOD with kind=10 for some array argument values

2008-04-16 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-16 15:54 ---
Subject: Bug 35944

Author: uros
Date: Wed Apr 16 15:53:59 2008
New Revision: 134348

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134348
Log:
PR target/35944
* config/i386/i386.md (fmodxf3): Copy operand 1 and operand 2 into
temporary registers.  Change operand predicate to general_operand.
(remainderxf3): Ditto.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.md


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35944



[Bug fortran/35944] [4.3, 4.4 regression] wrong result for MOD with kind=10 for some array argument values

2008-04-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-15 21:02 ---
Confirmed, this used to work for 4.2.

$ gfortran-4.2 foo.f90 
$ ./a.out
 kind =   10
  1 -1.40 -1.40  0.00
  2 -0.40 -0.40  0.00
  3 -0.40 -0.40  0.00
  4 -1.40 -1.40  0.00
  5 -1.90 -1.90  0.00
  6 -0.90 -0.90  0.00
  7 -4.40 -4.40  0.00
  8 -4.40 -4.40  0.00
  9 -4.40 -4.40  0.00
 10 -4.40 -4.40  0.00
$ gfortran-4.2 -v 
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared
--with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext
--enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2
--program-suffix=-4.2 --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug
--enable-objc-gc --enable-mpfr --disable-libmudflap --enable-targets=all
--enable-checking=release --build=i486-linux-gnu --host=i486-linux-gnu
--target=i486-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-3)
$ gfortran-4.3 foo.f90 
$ ./a.out
 kind =   10
  1  0.00 -1.40 -1.40
  2 -0.00 -0.40   NaN
  3 -0.40 -0.40  0.00
  4 -0.40 -1.40 -1.00
  5 -0.40 -1.90 -1.50
  6 -0.40 -0.90 -0.50
  7 -0.40 -4.40 -4.00
  8 -0.40 -4.40 -4.00
  9 -0.40 -4.40 -4.00
 10 -0.40 -4.40 -4.00
$ gfortran-4.3 -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure linux gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.3.1 20080309 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.0-1) 


-- 

tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||wrong-code
  Known to work||4.2.3
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-04-15 21:02:35
   date||
Summary|wrong result for MOD with   |[4.3, 4.4 regression] wrong
   |kind=10 for some array  |result for MOD with kind=10
   |argument values |for some array argument
   ||values


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35944



[Bug fortran/35944] [4.3, 4.4 regression] wrong result for MOD with kind=10 for some array argument values

2008-04-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-16 03:51 
---
The tree dump for the kind=8 and kind=10 are exactly identical except for the
call to __builtin_fmodl for kind=10 and __builtin_fmod for kind=8.

It looks like fmodl is broken.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35944