[Bug fortran/36355] matmul argument-check: wrong error messages

[dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-12 13:26 ---
Fixed in trunk. Closing.


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36355

[Bug fortran/36355] matmul argument-check: wrong error messages

[dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-12 13:24 ---
Subject: Bug 36355

Author: dfranke
Date: Fri Dec 12 13:22:55 2008
New Revision: 142709

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142709
Log:
gcc/fortran:
2008-12-12  Daniel Franke  

PR fortran/36355
* check.c (gfc_check_matmul): Fixed error message for invalid
types to correctly identify the offending argument, added check
for mismatching types.


gcc/testsuite:
2008-12-12 Daniel Franke  

PR fortran/36355
* gfortran.dg/matmul_argument_types.f90: New.


Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/matmul_argument_types.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/check.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36355

[Bug fortran/36355] matmul argument-check: wrong error messages

[dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortra
   ||n/2008-12/msg00138.html
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Keywords||patch
   Last reconfirmed|2008-07-22 12:30:06 |2008-12-09 17:48:14
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36355

[Bug fortran/36355] matmul argument-check: wrong error messages

[mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-08 22:35 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Judging from the latest status reports, I'll find the time to look into it
> again in December before 4.4 is released.
> 
We are in December, and 4.4 is not yet released. :p


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36355

[Bug fortran/36355] matmul argument-check: wrong error messages

[dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-25 12:29 ---
Not yet. IIRC, there was an issue left not addressed by this.

Judging from the latest status reports, I'll find the time to look into it
again in December before 4.4 is released.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36355

[Bug fortran/36355] matmul argument-check: wrong error messages

[tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-25 08:40 ---
Daniel, do you want to apply this patch?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36355

[Bug fortran/36355] matmul argument-check: wrong error messages

[tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-22 12:30 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Proposed patch passed regression test on i686-pc-linux-gnu..

Patch is approved (or obvious and simple, whatever you prefer :-)


-- 

tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-07-22 12:30:06
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36355

[Bug fortran/36355] matmul argument-check: wrong error messages

[dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-05-28 11:53 ---
Proposed patch passed regression test on i686-pc-linux-gnu..


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36355