[Bug fortran/36934] [4.4 regression] Spurious "ambiguous reference to...ERROR"/ICE
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-26 10:31 --- Test case added, closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36934
[Bug fortran/36934] [4.4 regression] Spurious "ambiguous reference to...ERROR"/ICE
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-26 10:31 --- Subject: Bug 36934 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Jul 26 10:30:50 2008 New Revision: 138167 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138167 Log: 2008-07-26 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/36934 * gfortran.dg/allocatable_module_1.f90: New test case. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocatable_module_1.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36934
[Bug fortran/36934] [4.4 regression] Spurious "ambiguous reference to...ERROR"/ICE
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2008-07-25 21:58 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Spurious "ambiguous reference to...ERROR"/ICE On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 21:44 +, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > I think it was my mistake. I assume Philip used my x86-64-linux nightly build. > I found out that I applied Daniel's finalizer patch to the wrong tree. So, resolve this as fixed and add a test case? Thomas -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36934
[Bug fortran/36934] [4.4 regression] Spurious "ambiguous reference to...ERROR"/ICE
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 21:44 --- > > New status, I did update my other tree (unpatched) to the latest SVN, and > > couldn't reproduce the problem there. > I tried the same with an unpatched tree. I think it was my mistake. I assume Philip used my x86-64-linux nightly build. I found out that I applied Daniel's finalizer patch to the wrong tree. That explains why it fails with the finalize patch but not with the (clean) trunk. However, knowing this failure is useful nonetheless as one can then iron out the problem before the finalizer merge. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36934
[Bug fortran/36934] [4.4 regression] Spurious "ambiguous reference to...ERROR"/ICE
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 21:21 --- (In reply to comment #4) > New status, I did update my other tree (unpatched) to the latest SVN, and > couldn't reproduce the problem there. I tried the same with an unpatched tree. Philip: Could you post the module files fred1.mod and fred2.mod that you got from the compilation? If all fails, we can always add the example as a test case. We'll then see a regression if the problem re-surfaces. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36934
[Bug fortran/36934] [4.4 regression] Spurious "ambiguous reference to...ERROR"/ICE
--- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 18:28 --- New status, I did update my other tree (unpatched) to the latest SVN, and couldn't reproduce the problem there. Maybe I messed something up or the problem occurs not "unconditionally"... With the patched finalizer-tree, I had this error, with unpatched trees I'm so far not able to reproduce it. But I'll give some further experiments to that one. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36934
[Bug fortran/36934] [4.4 regression] Spurious "ambiguous reference to...ERROR"/ICE
--- Comment #3 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 17:13 --- Hm... The tree I used for this check-in seems not to produce the crash, but my current working-copy for finalization (updated last yesterday evening) shows it (GNU/Linux-x86-32). I will try to find out more on this one, as my patch looks really as if it could be connected. -- domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||domob at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36934
[Bug fortran/36934] [4.4 regression] Spurious "ambiguous reference to...ERROR"/ICE
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 16:55 --- Can't confirm right now, but this might be a suspect (at least it is recent enough): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-07/msg00833.html -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Spurious "ambiguous |[4.4 regression] Spurious |reference to...ERROR"/ICE |"ambiguous reference ||to...ERROR"/ICE Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36934
