[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2009-04-10 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-04-10 21:03 
---
Closing as this seems to be completed.
Please reopen if there's an issue left.

Thanks for the reports!


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605



[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2009-01-03 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #9 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-04 00:29 ---
Anything left here?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605



[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2008-12-21 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #8 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-21 18:46 ---
Subject: Bug 37605

Author: domob
Date: Sun Dec 21 18:45:17 2008
New Revision: 142866

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142866
Log:
2008-12-21  Arjen Markus  
Daniel Kraft  

PR fortran/37605
* gfortran.texi: Fixed some typos and some minor style improvements.
* intrinsic.texi: Some clarifications and typo-fixes.
* invoke.texi: Better documenation of the behaviour of the
-fdefault-*-8 options and some other fixes.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi
trunk/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605



[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2008-12-10 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-10 10:01 ---
> But I can re-post it (or we welcome your opinions), of course.

Please repost. I haven't looked into it in detail yet.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605



[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2008-12-10 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-10 08:44 ---
I did post it to the mailing list some time ago and there was a little
discussion, IIRC, but no definite "review" or OK for it.  But I can re-post it
(or we welcome your opinions), of course.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605



[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2008-12-09 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-09 22:17 ---
Any specific reason why this wasn't applied yet?


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
   Keywords||documentation, patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605



[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2008-10-03 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-04 06:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=16461)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16461&action=view)
Patch addressing most of the "specific" remarks

This patch (posted to the list some time ago) addresses most of the specific
remarks; I'm not sure what we should do about it, but in my opinion at least
most of them are really improvements nice to have.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605



[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2008-09-21 Thread arjen dot markus at wldelft dot nl


--- Comment #3 from arjen dot markus at wldelft dot nl  2008-09-21 10:51 
---
Subject: Re:  Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

>
>
> --- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-21 10:31
> ---
> Just one more comment:  Thanks for the great list of typos and
> suggestions; if
> you want and need help, I can volunteer to fix some of them if I find some
> time
> to do so, as this should be trivially possible now with your preparation
> :)
>
>

Hi,

if you can do that, that would be great - I am quite new to this
process and submitting such remarks is much easier than providing
the actual patch :).

I can try and supply text describing what happens on the Windows
platform (that would be merely a matter of writing a small program
and checking the effects). Things regarding floating-point and
distributing an application are slightly tougher, as they probably
involve the properties of the various platforms.

Regards,

Arjen


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605



[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2008-09-21 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-21 10:31 ---
Just one more comment:  Thanks for the great list of typos and suggestions; if
you want and need help, I can volunteer to fix some of them if I find some time
to do so, as this should be trivially possible now with your preparation :)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605



[Bug fortran/37605] Remarks on user manual for Gfortran

2008-09-21 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-21 10:27 ---
Hi,

thanks for having a look at the manual!  This is surely greatly appreciated!

(In reply to comment #0)
> General remarks
> ---
> 1. Section on distributing programs is missing:
>What is needed if you have created a product to distribute it to
>customers? (Either with or without sources)
> 2. Section on floating-point issues is missing:
>How do the compile options influence the floating-point behaviour?
>What is the treatment of special values such as Inf and Nan?
>What happens with atan2(0,0)?
> 3. POSIX-type extensions in the language reference:
>No particular information is given how the various functions
>(SYMLNK for instance or STAT) work (or do not work) on a non-POSIX
>system like MS Windows.

All of those sound good to me (haven't read through your specific remarks, but
those are most probably 'obvious' and ok as well).  I'll confirm this PR.

I'm sure both a patch fixing the missing/superfluous words (or a set of patches
to split it up to managable sizes) and patches to add the new documentation
mentioned above will be very welcomed.  If you need assistance in figuring out
the information needed, just ask at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and someone will
hopefully help :)


-- 

domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-09-21 10:27:21
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37605