[Bug fortran/38675] FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
--- Comment #8 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-01 17:43 --- Subject: Bug 38675 Author: danglin Date: Thu Jan 1 17:42:00 2009 New Revision: 142995 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142995 Log: PR fortran/38675 Backport from mainline: 2008-12-09 Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@tele2.fr PR fortran/37469 * expr.c (find_array_element): Simplify array bounds. Assert that both bounds are constant expressions. 2008-10-31 Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@tele2.fr * expr.c (gfc_reduce_init_expr): New function, containing checking code from gfc_match_init_expr, so that checking can be deferred. (gfc_match_init_expr): Use gfc_reduce_init_expr. * match.h (gfc_reduce_init_expr): Prototype added. Modified: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/fortran/expr.c branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/fortran/match.h -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
[Bug fortran/38675] FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
--- Comment #9 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-01 17:44 --- Fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
[Bug fortran/38675] FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
--- Comment #10 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-01 17:45 --- Forgot to check button. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
[Bug fortran/38675] FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-12-31 23:28 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error) On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: Is backporting the fix for PR fortran/35840, or just gfc_reduce_init_expr, that difficult? No, it should be manageable. I currently testing the attached backport. It fixes the ICE on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. If there are no regressions on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, I will commit. I left off the change to io.c as it's a secondary issue. Dave --- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-12-31 23:28 --- Created an attachment (id=17019) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17019action=view) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
[Bug fortran/38675] FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 21:03 ---
(gdb) p *p
$2 = {expr_type = EXPR_ARRAY, ts = {type = BT_INTEGER, kind = 1,
derived = 0x0, cl = 0x0, is_c_interop = 0, is_iso_c = 0,
f90_type = BT_UNKNOWN}, rank = 0, shape = 0x800100131b58,
symtree = 0x0, ref = 0x800100131b90, where = {
nextc = 0x8001001279e3 [(1,i=1,len(HEX1))],
lb = 0x800100127998}, inline_noncopying_intrinsic = 0, is_boz = 0,
error = 0, con_by_offset = 0x0, representation = {length = 0,
string = 0x0}, value = {logical = -2147483647, integer = {{
_mp_alloc = -2147483647, _mp_size = 1242656, _mp_d = 0x0}}, real = {{
_mpfr_prec = 9223372041150985760, _mpfr_sign = 0, _mpfr_exp = 0,
_mpfr_d = 0x0}}, complex = {r = {{_mpfr_prec = 9223372041150985760,
_mpfr_sign = 0, _mpfr_exp = 0, _mpfr_d = 0x0}}, i = {{
_mpfr_prec = 0, _mpfr_sign = 0, _mpfr_exp = 0, _mpfr_d = 0x0}}},
op = {operator = -2147483647, uop = 0x0, op1 = 0x0, op2 = 0x0},
function = {actual = 0x80010012f620, name = 0x0, isym = 0x0,
esym = 0x0}, character = {length = -2147483647, string = 0x0},
constructor = 0x80010012f620}}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
[Bug fortran/38675] FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 21:15 --- See PR 37469 Given the last comment. This will probably be closed with a WONTFIX. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
[Bug fortran/38675] FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-12-30 21:40 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error) Given the last comment. This will probably be closed with a WONTFIX. Is backporting the fix for PR fortran/35840, or just gfc_reduce_init_expr, that difficult? Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
[Bug fortran/38675] FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
--- Comment #4 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 22:12 --- (In reply to comment #3) Is backporting the fix for PR fortran/35840, or just gfc_reduce_init_expr, that difficult? No, it should be manageable. I gave up when the patch refused to apply. Sorry. I could try harder. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
[Bug fortran/38675] FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-12-30 22:21 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error) Is backporting the fix for PR fortran/35840, or just gfc_reduce_init_expr, that difficult? No, it should be manageable. I gave up when the patch refused to apply. Sorry. I could try harder. There were a few formating changes and try changed to gfc_try. I'm just about to do a build with the backport. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38675
